Cardenas v. NBTY, Inc. et al

Filing 33

STIPULATION and ORDER 32 signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 2/3/12: Defendants' 26 Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint is RESET to 2/27/2012 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. The Initial Pretrial Status Conference is CONTINUED to 3/26/2012 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

BONNETT, FAIRBOURN, FRIEDMAN
& BALINT, P.C.
ANDREW S. FRIEDMAN (admitted pro hac vice)
ELAINE A. RYAN (admitted pro hac vice)
PATRICIA N. SYVERSON (203111)
2901 N. Central Ave., Suite 1000
Phoenix, AZ 85012
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Kara L. McCall (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
One South Dearborn Street
Chicago, Illinois 60603
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
David R. Carpenter, SBN 230299
[e-mail]
Cameron J. Johnson, SBN 266729
[e-mail]
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
555 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000
Los Angeles, California 90013
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants
NBTY, Inc. and Rexall Sundown, Inc.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

19
20
21

LILIANA CARDENAS, On Behalf of Herself
and All Other Similarly Situated California
Residents,

22

Plaintiff,

23

vs.

24
25

NBTY, INC., a Delaware corporation and
REXALL SUNDOWN, INC., a Florida
corporation,

26

Defendants.

27

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 11-cv-01615-LKK-CKD
SECOND JOINT STIPULATION AND
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT AND RESETTING INITIAL
STATUS CONFERENCE

28
SECOND JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND RESETTING INITIAL
STATUS CONFERENCE

1

The parties, by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

2

WHEREAS, on June 14, 2011, Plaintiff filed her Complaint and initiated the above-

3
4

referenced action; and
WHEREAS, by and/or as reflected in the Joint Stipulation and Order dated September 26,

5

2011 [Dkt. #21]: (a) the parties agreed that Plaintiff would file a Second Amended Complaint in lieu

6

of formally opposing Defendants’ filed motion to dismiss, and the court granted leave for such

7

amendment; (b) Defendants’ time to respond to the Second Amended Complaint was set for

8

November 23, 2011; and (c) the Court continued the initial Status Conference to December 19, 2011,

9

with status reports due fourteen (14) days prior; and

10

WHEREAS, on October 24, 2011, Plaintiff filed her Second Amended Complaint; and

11

WHEREAS Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint on

12

November 23, 2011 and briefing on Defendants’ Motion was completed on January 24, 2012; and

13

WHEREAS on January 31, 2012, Plaintiffs’ counsel notified Defendants’ counsel of a

14

scheduling conflict with the February 13, 2012 hearing date that the parties had previously agreed to.

15

The parties agreed to reschedule the hearing for Defendants’ Motion to February 27, 2012, or as

16

soon thereafter as is convenient for the Court; and

17

WHEREAS, the parties further agree that it would be most efficient and facilitate the parties’

18

ability to meet and confer about the matters required for their status reports if the initial Status

19

Conference, currently set for February 27, 2012, with joint reports due two weeks prior thereto, were

20

continued until after Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint is heard and

21

decided.

22

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties stipulate as follows:

23

1.

Defendants’ motion is re-set for hearing on February 27, 2012 at 10:00 a.m.

24
25
26
27
28
SECOND JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND RESETTING INITIAL
STATUS CONFERENCE

1
2

2.

The initial Pretrial Status Conference is continued to March 26, 2012 at 1:30 p.m.

3

The parties shall file their status reports 14 days prior to the status conference.

4

Dated: February 2, 2012

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

5
By: /s/ David R. Carpenter
David R. Carpenter
Attorneys for Defendants NBTY, Inc., and
Rexall Sundown, Inc.

6
7
8
Dated: February 2, 2012
9

BONNETT, FAIRBOURN, FRIEDMAN &
BALINT, P.C.

10
By: /s/ Patricia N. Syverson
Patricia N. Syverson
Attorneys for Plaintiff Liliana Cardenas

11
12
13
14

IT IS SO ORDERED.

15

Dated: February 3, 2012.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
SECOND JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESETTING PRETRIAL STATUS CONFERENCE
AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

1
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on February 2, 2012, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk

3

of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the e-mail

4

addresses denoted on the Electronic Mail notice list, and I hereby certify that I have mailed the

5

foregoing document or paper via the United States Postal Service to the non-CM/ECF participants

6

indicated on the Manual Notice list.

7
8
9
10
11
12
13

I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the
foregoing is true and correct. Executed on February 2, 2012.
By: s/ Patricia N. Syverson
BONNETT FAIRBOURN FRIEDMAN
& BALINT, PC
2901 North Central Avenue, Suite 1000
Phoenix, Arizona 85012
602-274-1100
602-274-1199 facsimile
Email: [e-mail]

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
SECOND JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESETTING PRETRIAL STATUS CONFERENCE
AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS