Burton v. Cate
Filing
25
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 04/16/12 denying 22 Motion to be billed for appeal filing fees. Also, RECOMMENDING that the motion to vacate judgment 23 be denied. motion to vacate judgment 23 referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 21 days.(Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
ERIC WILTON BURTON
11
12
13
Petitioner,
No. CIV S-11-1616 MCE CKD P
vs.
MATTHEW CATE
ORDER AND
14
15
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Respondents.
16
17
/
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for writ of
18
habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On October 7, 2011, the court dismissed the petition
19
because it attacked a judgment already on collateral review in the Southern District of California.
20
In so ruling, the court did not grant petitioner his request to proceed in forma pauperis. Petitioner
21
appealed the dismissal to the Ninth Circuit. That court also denied his request to proceed in
22
forma pauperis, and it dismissed his appeal when petitioner failed to pay the filing fee. See
23
Docket No. 21.
24
Petitioner has now filed a motion seeking this court’s assistance in meeting his
25
obligation to pay the filing fees necessary to restore his appeal. The motion is essentially a
26
request for reconsideration of petitioner’s initial motion to proceed in forma pauperis. It is
1
1
without merit and will be denied.
2
3
Petitioner has also moved to vacate the court’s judgment of dismissal. It too is
without merit and should be denied.
4
5
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion to be billed for appeal
filing fees (Docket No. 22) is denied.
6
7
IT IS RECOMMENDED that the motion to vacate judgment (Docket No. 23) be
denied.
8
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District
9
Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty-
10
one days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written
11
objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s
12
Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the
13
specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951
14
F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
15
Dated: April 16, 2012
16
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
1
2
3
4
3
5
burt1616.ord
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?