Brafman v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Filing
27
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 2/16/12, ORDERING that Counsel's request to continue the hearing is GRANTED; and the hearing on defendant's 19 Motion to Dismiss is CONTINUED to 5/3/2012 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.. In addition, the Court's 1/31/12 imposition of sanctions is hereby VACATED. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROBERTA BRAFMAN,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:11-cv-01627-MCE-GGH
v.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE
COMPANY & ITS AFFILIATES,
15
Defendant.
16
----oo0oo---17
18
The Court is in receipt of the February 7, 2012, Motion to
19
Vacate Court’s Order and for New Hearing on Motion to Dismiss
20
(ECF No. 26) filed by Plaintiff’s counsel (“Counsel”).
21
January 31, 2012, Order, this Court had sanctioned counsel in the
22
amount of $250 and re-set the hearing on Defendant Nationwide
23
Mutual Insurance Company’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss for
24
2:00 p.m. on Thursday, February 23, 2012.
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
By its
1
Counsel now seeks to vacate that Order and to continue the
2
hearing to the week of April 23, 2012.1
3
shown, Counsel’s request to continue the hearing is GRANTED, and
4
the February 23, 2012, hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss
5
is VACATED and CONTINUED to Thursday, May 3, 2012, at 2:00 p.m.
6
in Courtroom 7.
7
imposition of sanctions is hereby VACATED.
8
9
Good cause having been
In addition, the Court’s January 31, 2012
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 16, 2012
10
11
_____________________________
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
1
27
28
The moving papers refer to the Court’s “January 13, 2012,”
Order. The Court did not issue an order on January 13, and the
Court therefore construes Counsel’s Motion to be directed at the
Order issued on January 31.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?