Haught v. City of Anderson et al

Filing 67

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/11/2015 ALLOWING the plaintiff to take 11 depositions, instead of 10, as indicated in F.R.Cv.P. Rule 30. (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 JOHN DOUGLAS BARR………………. TROY DOUGLAS MUDFORD………… DAVID LEE CASE……………………… ESTEE LEWIS………………………….. CATHLEEN T. BARR ............................... BARR & MUDFORD, LLP 1824 Court Street/Post Office Box 994390 Redding, California 96099-4390 Telephone: (530) 243-8008 Fax: (530) 243-1648 California State Bar No. 40663 California State Bar No. 146392 California State Bar No. 56701 California State Bar No. 268358 California State Bar No. 295538 Attorneys for Plaintiff, KATRINA HAUGHT 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORIA 12 13 KATRINA HAUGHT 14 Plaintiff, 15 vs. 16 17 18 19 No. 2:11-CV-01653-JAM-CMK STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND NUMBER OF DEPOSITIONS TO BE TAKEN BY PLAINTIFF THE CITY OF ANDERSON; THE CITY OF ANDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT; DALE WEBB in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the City of Anderson Police Department; and DOES 1-20. 20 Defendants. 21 22 Plaintiff, KATRINA HAUGHT, and Defendants, THE CITY OF ANDERSON and 23 CHIEF DALE WEBB, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate to, 24 25 26 27 28 and respectfully request the Court enter an Order extending the number of depositions to be taken by plaintiff to 11 depositions, instead of 10 under F.R.C.P. 30. /// The parties respectfully submit that good cause exists for extending the number of BARR & MUDFORD Attorneys at Law 1824 Court Street Post Office Box 994390 Redding, CA 96099-4390 (530) 243-8008 Page 1 Stipulation and Order to Extend Number of Depositions to be Taken by Plaintiff 1 depositions permitted by plaintiff to 11 to allow plaintiff to depose the necessary witnesses in 2 this case. Since the instant action involves an entire police department, and the training and 3 supervision of certain officers, there are dozens of people with pertinent information that could 4 assist plaintiffs. Plaintiffs have done their best to curtail the number of depositions, but given 5 the circumstances surrounding this case, plaintiffs are unable to limit the necessary deponents 6 7 8 to 10 people. Defendants appreciate plaintiff’s situation, and are accommodating plaintiff’s request accordingly. 9 10 11 IT IS SO STIPULATED: 12 13 DATED: March 11, 2015 BARR & MUDFORD, LLP 14 15 /s/ Cathleen T. Barr CATHLEEN T. BARR (SBN 295538) Attorneys for Plaintiff KATRINA HAUGHT, aka JANE DOE 16 17 18 DATED: March 11, 2015 ANGELO, KILDAY & KILDUFF 19 20 21 22 23 /s/ Bruce A. Kilday BRUCE A. KILDAY Attorneys for Defendants, THE CITY OF ANDERSON; THE CITY OF ANDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT; and DALE WEBB, in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the City of Anderson Police Department 24 25 26 ORDER 27 28 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff be allowed to take 11 depositions, instead of BARR & MUDFORD Attorneys at Law 1824 Court Street Post Office Box 994390 Redding, CA 96099-4390 (530) 243-8008 Page 2 Stipulation and Order to Extend Number of Depositions to be Taken by Plaintiff 1 10, as indicated in F.R.C.P. 30. 2 3 4 DATED: 3/11/2015 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ JOHN A. MENDEZ United States District Court Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 BARR & MUDFORD Attorneys at Law 1824 Court Street Post Office Box 994390 Redding, CA 96099-4390 (530) 243-8008 Page 3 Stipulation and Order to Extend Number of Depositions to be Taken by Plaintiff

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?