Ward v. Ives et al

Filing 64

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 1/6/2015 ORDERING that the 61 Findings and Recommendations are ADOPTED in full. This action is DISMISSED. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)

1

-

2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JOHN C. WARD,

12
13
14

No. 2:11-cv-1657-GEB-EFB P
Plaintiff,

v.

ORDER

RICHARD IVES, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff is proceeding without counsel in an action brought pursuant to the Federal Tort

18

Claims Act (“FTCA”) claim and First Amendment and Eighth Amendment claims under Bivens

19

v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). The matter

20

was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local

21

Rule 302.

22

On November 18, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

23

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to

24

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed

25

objections to the findings and recommendations.

26

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

27

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

28

ORDERED that:
1

1

1. The findings and recommendations filed November 18, 2014, are adopted in full; and

2

2. This action is dismissed. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E. D. Cal. Local Rule 110.

3

Dated: January 6, 2015

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2