Williams v. Swarthout et al

Filing 31

ORDER denying 30 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 04/11/13. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 MARIO A. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 16 17 No. 2:11-cv-1687 LKK AC (P) vs. GARY SWARTHOUT, et al., Defendants. ORDER / Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme 18 Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent 19 prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In 20 certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel 21 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); 22 Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). 23 In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional 24 circumstances. Plaintiff has been able to articulate his claims, and any difficulty plaintiff 25 currently claims, such as the need to conduct discovery, is not derived from the complexity of 26 the issues involved. See Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328, 1331 (9th Cir. 1986). 1 1 Plaintiff argues that he may experience retaliation on account of his lawsuit, that 2 the case may be tried to a jury, or that he may need expert testimony. See ECF No. 30 at 3-4. 3 Because plaintiff’s arguments are speculative, they are currently insufficient to warrant the relief 4 requested. However, the court will deny the motion without prejudice to renewal at a later date, 5 in case plaintiff’s circumstances change. 6 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s request for the 7 appointment of counsel (Docket No. 30) is denied without prejudice to renewal at a later stage in 8 the proceedings. 9 DATED: April 11, 2013. 10 11 ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 AC:rb 13 will1687.31 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?