Cahill v. Bank of America, NA

Filing 11

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 2/6/12 ORDERING service is appropriate for the following defendants: Bank of America, Reconstruct Company, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., American HomeMortgage Corp and FEPRS, LLC.; the Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff 5 USM-285 forms, 1 summons, an instruction sheet and a copy of the amended complaint filed 11/22/11. Within 30 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the following documents to the U.S. Marshal: the completed Notice of Submission of Documents; 1 completed summons; 1 completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed in number 1 above; and 6 copies of the endorsed amended compla int filed November 22, 2011. Plaintiff need not attempt service on defendants and need not request waiver of service. Within 10 days of submission of the documents to the U.S. Marshal, plaintiff shall file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the U.S. Marshal, 501 I Street, Sacramento, Ca., 95814. (Meuleman, A) (cc: USM).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DIANE CAHILL, Plaintiff, 10 11 12 13 vs. BANK OF AMERICA, NA, et al., Defendants. ORDER / 14 15 No. CIV 2:11-cv-1688-MCE-JFM (PS) Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. By order filed November 8, 2011, 16 plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed with leave to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff has now 17 filed an amended complaint. 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), the court is directed to dismiss the case at any 19 time if it determines the allegation of poverty is untrue, or the action is frivolous or malicious, 20 fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against an immune 21 defendant. The court cannot make this determination on the present record. Therefore, the court 22 reserves decision on these issues until the record is sufficiently developed. 23 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 24 1. Service is appropriate for the following defendants: Bank of America, 25 Reconstruct Company, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., American Home 26 Mortgage Corp and FEPRS, LLC. 1 1 2 2. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff 5 USM-285 forms, one summons, an instruction sheet and a copy of the amended complaint filed November 22, 2011. 3 3. Within thirty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the 4 attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the following documents to the United 5 States Marshal: 6 a. The completed Notice of Submission of Documents; 7 b. One completed summons; 8 c. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed in number 1 9 above; and 10 d. 6 copies of the endorsed amended complaint filed November 22, 2011. 11 12 13 14 15 4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on defendants and need not request waiver of service. 5. Within ten (10) days of submission of the documents to the United States Marshal, plaintiff shall file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted. 6. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the U.S. 16 Marshal, 501 “I” Street, Sacramento, Ca., 95814. 17 DATED: February 6, 2012. 18 19 20 21 /014;cahi1688.1amd 22 23 24 25 26 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DIANE CAHILL, Plaintiff, 11 12 13 No. CIV 2:11-cv-1688-MCE-JFM (PS) vs. BANK OF AMERICA, NA, et al., Defendants. 14 OF DOCUMENTS / 15 Plaintiff hereby submits the following documents in compliance with the court's 16 17 NOTICE OF SUBMISSION order filed : 18 completed summons form 19 completed USM-285 forms 20 copies of the Amended Complaint 21 DATED: 22 23 Plaintiff 24 25 26

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?