Helm v. United States Postal Service et al

Filing 33

STIPULATION and ORDER 32 signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 5/30/13 ORDERING that the discover cutoff date is EXTENDED from 6/21/13 to 9/27/13. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorneys LYNN TRINKA ERNCE Assistant United States Attorney 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 554-2720 Attorneys for the United States of America 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSEPH HELM, Plaintiff, 12 STIPULATION REQUESTING MODIFICATION OF SCHEDULING ORDER v. 13 14 Case No. 2:11-cv-01703 MCE EFB UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. 15 16 The parties to this action, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree 17 18 as follows: 1. 19 On December 20, 2012, the Court entered its Status (Pretrial Scheduling) 20 Order. Docket 28. The Court set the following deadlines for this case: 21 Discovery Cutoff Expert Witness Disclosure Supplemental Expert Witness Disclosure Dispositive Motions Heard By Joint Pretrial Conference Statement Due Evidentiary/Procedural Motions Due Oppositions to Evidentiary/Procedural Due Replies to Evidentiary/Procedural Due Final Pretrial Conference Trial Briefs Due Trial 22 23 24 25 26 27 /// 28 /// 29 Stipulation to Modify Scheduling Order 1 June 21, 2013 August 21, 2013 September 10, 2013 December 19, 2013 February 13, 2014 February 13, 2014 February 20, 2014 February 27, 2014 March 6, 2014 February 13, 2014 April 21, 2014 2. 1 This case involves allegations by plaintiff that Jay Negus, a former United 2 States Postal Service employee, who was acting in the course and scope of his federal 3 employment at the time of the incident, caused an auto accident that injured plaintiff. 3. 4 Criminal charges against Negus are pending in San Joaquin Superior 5 Court. The trial date has been moved a number of times, most recently, from May 10, 6 2013 to August 2, 2013. Negus’ attorneys have stated that they would not make Negus 7 available for deposition in this civil action until his criminal matter has concluded and 8 that, if Negus is subpoenaed to testify at deposition, they will instruct him to assert his 9 Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination in response to questions concerning 10 the auto accident. 11 4. Under the circumstances, it is not possible for Negus to give meaningful 12 testimony at a deposition in this civil action prior to the current June 21, 2013 discovery 13 cutoff, and the parties believe that good cause exists for the Court to modify its 14 scheduling order so that Negus may be deposed after the criminal matter has concluded. 5. 15 Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that the Court modify the 16 scheduling order to extend the discovery cutoff date from June 21, 2013 to September 27, 17 2013. 18 6. Since the parties are not asking the Court to change any of the other dates 19 at this time, modification of the scheduling order will not prejudice any party, and should 20 not negatively impact the Court’s schedule for this case. However, if the Negus trial is 21 rescheduled again, it may be necessary for the parties to seek further modification of the 22 scheduling order. 23 DATED: May 22, 2013 24 By: 25 26 27 28 29 Stipulation to Modify Scheduling Order 2 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney /s/ Lynn Trinka Ernce LYNN TRINKA ERNCE Assistant United States Attorney 1 DATED: May 22, 2013 By: 2 3 /s/ Russell A. Robinson Russell A. Robinson Attorney for Plaintiff ORDER 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: May 30, 2013 6 7 ___________________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., CHIEF JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Stipulation to Modify Scheduling Order 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?