Broadbent v. Martel

Filing 37

ORDER signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 1/29/13 DENYING 35 and 36 Motions to Proceed IFP as moot. (Manzer, C)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JAMUAL BROADBENT,
No. 2:11-cv-01711-JKS
Petitioner,
vs.

ORDER
[Re: Motions at Docket Nos. 35 and 36]

M. MARTEL, Warden, Mule Creek State
Prison,
Respondent.

At Docket Numbers 35 and 36, Jamual Broadbent, a state prisoner appearing pro se, filed
motions to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. There is no filing fee required for a state
prisoner to appeal from the denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C.
§ 2254.1 Accordingly,
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT the Motions to Proceed In Forma Pauperis at
Docket Numbers 35 and 36 are DENIED as moot.
Dated: January 29, 2013.
/s/ James K. Singleton, Jr.
JAMES K. SINGLETON, JR.
United States District Judge

1

Naddi v. Hill, 106 F.3d 275, 277 (9th Cir. 1997).