Moody v. Delta Air Lines et al
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 10/21/11 ORDERING that the court will retain jurisdiction over the proceeding. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
----oo0oo---11
12
JEAN MOODY,
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
NO. CIV. 2:11-1739 WBS CKD
16
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; DELTA AIR
LINES INC., a Delaware
corporation, and DOES 1-100,
17
Defendants.
15
ORDER
/
18
19
20
----oo0oo---This proceeding was removed from state court by Delta
21
Airlines on June 28, 2011.
However, under the terms of 28 U.S.C.
22
§ 1441(b), a party may remove an action on the basis of diversity
23
“only if none of the parties in interest properly joined and
24
served as defendants is a citizen of the State in which such
25
action is brought.”
26
removal, the County of Sacramento, having been served on June 20,
27
2011, was a properly joined and served defendant, and is a
28
resident of California.
28 U.S.C. § 1441(b).
At the time of
See Illinois v. City of Milwaukee, 406
1
1
U.S. 91, 97 (1972) (“It is well settled that for the purposes of
2
diversity of citizenship, political subdivisions are citizens of
3
their respective States.”).
4
removal under § 1441(b) was improper.
5
Therefore, it would appear that
The Ninth Circuit has held, however, that the
6
“additional limitation on diversity-based removal jurisdiction
7
[in § 1441(b)] is a procedural, or non-jurisdictional, rule.”
8
Lively v. Wild Oats Markets, Inc., 456 F.3d 933, 939 (9th Cir.
9
2006).
Under § 1441(c), a motion to remand on the basis of a
10
defect in removal procedure, such as a violation of section
11
1441(b), must be brought within thirty days or the defect is
12
waived.
13
plaintiff failed to object to the improper removal of this
14
proceeding within thirty days, the court is unable to remand the
15
proceeding to the proper forum.
16
retain jurisdiction over the proceeding.
17
18
28 U.S.C. § 1441(c); Lively, 456 F.3d at 942.
Because
Accordingly, the court will
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: October 21, 2011
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?