Kilgore v. Grannis et al
Filing
32
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/14/14 ORDERING that the amended findings and recommendations filed October 3, 2014, are adopted in full; and Defendants' motion to dismiss 25 is denied as to Defendants Auer, King, Molina, Mwai, Okoroike, and Riggs, but granted as to Defendant Freitas. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
IVAN KILGORE,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:11-cv-1745 TLN DAD P
v.
ORDER
DIRECTOR et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On October 3, 2014, the magistrate judge filed amended findings and recommendations
20
21
herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any
22
objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither
23
party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
24
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
1. The amended findings and recommendations filed October 3, 2014, are adopted in full;
27
28
and
1
1
2
2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 25) is denied as to Defendants Auer, King,
Molina, Mwai, Okoroike, and Riggs, but granted as to Defendant Freitas
3
4
Dated: November 14, 2014
5
6
7
8
9
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?