Doe v. Sacramento Dept. of Health and Human Services
Filing
32
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 4/8/2013 CONTINUING the Initial Expert Disclosure date to 7/8/2013; CONTINUING the Supplemental and Rebuttal Expert Witness Disclosure date to 7/15/2013; CONTINUING the Discovery completion date to 9/1/2013. (Michel, G)
1
2
3
4
RICHARD A. FRISHMAN, SB# 059383
205 North Pine Street
Nevada City, CA 95959
Telephone: (530)265-2399
Fax:
(530)478-9442
Attorney for JOHN DOE, a minor, by his
Guardian ad Litem, KATHRYN CLARK
5
6
7
LONGYEAR, O’DEA & LAVRA, LLP
3620 American River Drive, Suite 230
Sacramento, CA 95864
Telephone: (916) 974-8500
Fax:
(916) 974-8510
8
9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
JOHN DOE, a minor
Case Number: 2:11-CV-01767-JAMJFM
Plaintiff,
12
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
EXTENSION
OF
TIME
FOR
COMPLETION OF DISCOVERY
AND
EXPERT
WITNESS
DISCLOSURES
13
14
15
16
vs.
US Dist. Ct. Eastern Dist. CA Rule
143
17
18
19
20
21
SACRAMENTO DEPARTMENT OF
HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
-CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES OF
SACRAMENTO COUNTY, and DOES
I through XXXV, inclusive.
Defendants.
_
/
22
23
Pursuant to Local Rule 143, the parties to the within action, by their respective
24
counsel, hereby stipulate to extend the time within which to complete discovery and
25
for all expert witness disclosures.
26
The Court has granted one prior Stipulation for Extension of time for Expert
27
Witness Disclosures and Discovery Completion Date which was filed by the parties
28
- 1 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR COMPLETION OF DISCOVERY AND EXPERT
WITNESS DISCLOSURES
1
2
3
on January 11, 2013.
At all times through this litigation, the parties have diligently pursued written
discovery and have made significant document exchanges. The defense has
4
provided Plaintiff with over 3,000 pages of written discovery.
5
6
The parties have completed depositions of the minor Plaintiff’s parents, one of
7
two foster parents where the placement of the minor was in effect at the time of his
8
burn injuries, as well as the two social workers who inspected the residence of, and
9
interviewed the, foster parents prior to the placement. The Plaintiff has submitted to
10
the requested defense IME; but, the report is not yet available.
11
12
Plaintiff has noticed the deposition of one of defendant’s Kinship Unit’s
13
supervisors for April 25, 2013, in order to obtain further information as to policies, and
14
implementation of same, as relevant to this action.
15
Nevertheless, the parties will not be able to complete discovery, and will not
16
be able to make complete and knowing expert disclosures, as currently calendared,
17
18
19
for the following reasons:
Despite significant, good faith, efforts of the defense, a deposition subpoena
20
has yet to be served on the foster parent (Fernando Ramirez, a NREFM) who was
21
present when Plaintiff suffered his burn injuries. Mr. Ramirez, as an eye and/or ear,
22
witness to the events which resulted in the burn injuries, is a material witness to this
23
action for both sides.
24
25
Additionally, the parties have discussed conducting Mediation prior to filing of
26
various Motions and hiring of experts. Plaintiff will be filing a Motion to Amend,
27
seeking leave to name one or more employees of CPS as Defendants to the action.
28
- 2 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR COMPLETION OF DISCOVERY AND EXPERT
WITNESS DISCLOSURES
1
Absent settlement, Defendant has advised that it will file a Motion for Summary
2
3
4
Judgment. Such a Motion will be opposed.
An extension, as Stipulated here, will permit the parties to fully complete
5
discovery, gain further information as to case value, and increase the potential for
6
conducting Mediation and reaching settlement.
7
At this time, the parties do not seek extension of the dates for Final Pretrial
8
9
10
11
12
Conference or Trial.
Therefore, the parties jointly propose setting the following deadlines as
follows:
Initial Disclosure of Expert Witnesses:
13
Proposed new deadline: July 8, 2013 (current deadline - April 30, 2013)
14
15
Disclosure of Supplemental and Rebuttal Expert Witnesses:
16
Proposed new deadline: July 15, 2013 (current deadline – May 7, 2013)
17
Discovery Completion:
18
Proposed new deadline: September 1, 2013 (current deadline – July 1,
19
2013)
20
WHEREAS, this Stipulation, and requests contained therein, are not being
21
22
made for purposes of delay, or any other improper purpose; and
23
WHEREAS, continuing the deadlines for completing discovery and for
24
disclosure of expert witnesses will not prejudice either party or have negative impact
25
upon the judicial administration of this Court;
26
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed by Plaintiff and
27
28
- 3 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR COMPLETION OF DISCOVERY AND EXPERT
WITNESS DISCLOSURES
1
Defendant, through their respective attorneys of records, that this Court may continue
2
3
4
the deadlines as requested and set forth above.
IT IS SO STIPULATED:
5
6
DATED: April 5, 2013
/s/_________________________________
RICHARD A. FRISHMAN, CSB # 059383
Attorney for Plaintiff
e-mail: richardfrishman@yahoo.com
7
8
9
10
DATED: April 5, 2013
LONGYEAR, O’DEA, & LAVRA, LLP, by:
11
12
13
/s/_________________________________
JOHN A. LAVRA, CSB #114533
Attorney for Defendants
e-mail: lavra@longyearlaw.com
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
- 4 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR COMPLETION OF DISCOVERY AND EXPERT
WITNESS DISCLOSURES
1
2
3
4
ORDER ON STIPULATION
Pursuant to Stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
Initial Expert Disclosure date in this action is continued to: July 8, 2013
Supplemental and Rebuttal Expert Witness Disclosure date in this action is
5
continued to: July 15, 2013
6
Discovery completion date in this action is continued to: September 1, 2013.
7
SO ORDERED: 4/8/2013
8
9
/s/ John A. Mendez________________
THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ
United States District Court Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
- 5 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR COMPLETION OF DISCOVERY AND EXPERT
WITNESS DISCLOSURES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?