Doe v. Sacramento Dept. of Health and Human Services

Filing 32

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 4/8/2013 CONTINUING the Initial Expert Disclosure date to 7/8/2013; CONTINUING the Supplemental and Rebuttal Expert Witness Disclosure date to 7/15/2013; CONTINUING the Discovery completion date to 9/1/2013. (Michel, G)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 RICHARD A. FRISHMAN, SB# 059383 205 North Pine Street Nevada City, CA 95959 Telephone: (530)265-2399 Fax: (530)478-9442 Attorney for JOHN DOE, a minor, by his Guardian ad Litem, KATHRYN CLARK 5 6 7 LONGYEAR, O’DEA & LAVRA, LLP 3620 American River Drive, Suite 230 Sacramento, CA 95864 Telephone: (916) 974-8500 Fax: (916) 974-8510 8 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 JOHN DOE, a minor Case Number: 2:11-CV-01767-JAMJFM Plaintiff, 12 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR COMPLETION OF DISCOVERY AND EXPERT WITNESS DISCLOSURES 13 14 15 16 vs. US Dist. Ct. Eastern Dist. CA Rule 143 17 18 19 20 21 SACRAMENTO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES -CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES OF SACRAMENTO COUNTY, and DOES I through XXXV, inclusive. Defendants. _ / 22 23 Pursuant to Local Rule 143, the parties to the within action, by their respective 24 counsel, hereby stipulate to extend the time within which to complete discovery and 25 for all expert witness disclosures. 26 The Court has granted one prior Stipulation for Extension of time for Expert 27 Witness Disclosures and Discovery Completion Date which was filed by the parties 28 - 1 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR COMPLETION OF DISCOVERY AND EXPERT WITNESS DISCLOSURES 1 2 3 on January 11, 2013. At all times through this litigation, the parties have diligently pursued written discovery and have made significant document exchanges. The defense has 4 provided Plaintiff with over 3,000 pages of written discovery. 5 6 The parties have completed depositions of the minor Plaintiff’s parents, one of 7 two foster parents where the placement of the minor was in effect at the time of his 8 burn injuries, as well as the two social workers who inspected the residence of, and 9 interviewed the, foster parents prior to the placement. The Plaintiff has submitted to 10 the requested defense IME; but, the report is not yet available. 11 12 Plaintiff has noticed the deposition of one of defendant’s Kinship Unit’s 13 supervisors for April 25, 2013, in order to obtain further information as to policies, and 14 implementation of same, as relevant to this action. 15 Nevertheless, the parties will not be able to complete discovery, and will not 16 be able to make complete and knowing expert disclosures, as currently calendared, 17 18 19 for the following reasons: Despite significant, good faith, efforts of the defense, a deposition subpoena 20 has yet to be served on the foster parent (Fernando Ramirez, a NREFM) who was 21 present when Plaintiff suffered his burn injuries. Mr. Ramirez, as an eye and/or ear, 22 witness to the events which resulted in the burn injuries, is a material witness to this 23 action for both sides. 24 25 Additionally, the parties have discussed conducting Mediation prior to filing of 26 various Motions and hiring of experts. Plaintiff will be filing a Motion to Amend, 27 seeking leave to name one or more employees of CPS as Defendants to the action. 28 - 2 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR COMPLETION OF DISCOVERY AND EXPERT WITNESS DISCLOSURES 1 Absent settlement, Defendant has advised that it will file a Motion for Summary 2 3 4 Judgment. Such a Motion will be opposed. An extension, as Stipulated here, will permit the parties to fully complete 5 discovery, gain further information as to case value, and increase the potential for 6 conducting Mediation and reaching settlement. 7 At this time, the parties do not seek extension of the dates for Final Pretrial 8 9 10 11 12 Conference or Trial. Therefore, the parties jointly propose setting the following deadlines as follows: Initial Disclosure of Expert Witnesses: 13 Proposed new deadline: July 8, 2013 (current deadline - April 30, 2013) 14 15 Disclosure of Supplemental and Rebuttal Expert Witnesses: 16 Proposed new deadline: July 15, 2013 (current deadline – May 7, 2013) 17 Discovery Completion: 18 Proposed new deadline: September 1, 2013 (current deadline – July 1, 19 2013) 20 WHEREAS, this Stipulation, and requests contained therein, are not being 21 22 made for purposes of delay, or any other improper purpose; and 23 WHEREAS, continuing the deadlines for completing discovery and for 24 disclosure of expert witnesses will not prejudice either party or have negative impact 25 upon the judicial administration of this Court; 26 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed by Plaintiff and 27 28 - 3 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR COMPLETION OF DISCOVERY AND EXPERT WITNESS DISCLOSURES 1 Defendant, through their respective attorneys of records, that this Court may continue 2 3 4 the deadlines as requested and set forth above. IT IS SO STIPULATED: 5 6 DATED: April 5, 2013 /s/_________________________________ RICHARD A. FRISHMAN, CSB # 059383 Attorney for Plaintiff e-mail: richardfrishman@yahoo.com 7 8 9 10 DATED: April 5, 2013 LONGYEAR, O’DEA, & LAVRA, LLP, by: 11 12 13 /s/_________________________________ JOHN A. LAVRA, CSB #114533 Attorney for Defendants e-mail: lavra@longyearlaw.com 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 - 4 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR COMPLETION OF DISCOVERY AND EXPERT WITNESS DISCLOSURES 1 2 3 4 ORDER ON STIPULATION Pursuant to Stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: Initial Expert Disclosure date in this action is continued to: July 8, 2013 Supplemental and Rebuttal Expert Witness Disclosure date in this action is 5 continued to: July 15, 2013 6 Discovery completion date in this action is continued to: September 1, 2013. 7 SO ORDERED: 4/8/2013 8 9 /s/ John A. Mendez________________ THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ United States District Court Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 - 5 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR COMPLETION OF DISCOVERY AND EXPERT WITNESS DISCLOSURES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?