Palmer v. Wells Fargo, NA
Filing
10
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 08/26/11 ORDERING that the 08/31/11 heaaring on the 4 Motion to Dismiss is taken OFF CALENDAR and the matter is submitted on the record. (Benson, A.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KELLY T. PALMER,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
vs.
ORDER
WELLS FARGO, NA.,
Defendant.
16
17
No. CIV S-11-1786-KJM-CMK
/
Plaintiffs, proceeding in this action in propria persona, bring this civil action
18
related to the foreclosure of her property. This action was removed to this court from the Shasta
19
County Superior Court on July 1, 2011. Pending before the court is the defendants’ motion to
20
dismiss (Doc.46), currently set for hearing on August 31, 2011. Plaintiff has not filed an
21
opposition to the motion.
22
Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rules, any opposition “to the
23
granting of the motion shall be in writing and shall be filed and served not less than fourteen (14)
24
days preceding the noticed . . . hearing date.” See Local Rule 230(c). The local rules further
25
provide that “[n]o party will be entitled to be heard in opposition to a motion at oral arguments if
26
opposition to the motion has not been timely filed by that party.” Id.
1
1
Accordingly, and pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), the hearing scheduled for August
2
31, 2011, at 10:00 a.m. before the undersigned in Redding, California, is hereby taken off
3
calendar and the matter is submitted on the record and briefs.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
7
8
DATED: August 26, 2011
______________________________________
CRAIG M. KELLISON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?