Anderson et al v. Echols et al

Filing 48

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 1/2/2013 ORDERING that the 1/9/2013 hearing re 47 Motion for Summary Judgment is VACATED. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RON J. ANDERSON, et al., 12 13 14 15 16 17 No. 2:11-CV-1795-CMK Plaintiffs, vs. ORDER GREG ECHOLS, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiffs, who are proceeding pro se, bring this civil action for, among other 18 things, determination of ownership interests in the “Stringer Mine.” On December 20, 2012, 19 defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, noticed for hearing before the undersigned on 20 January 9, 2013. Defendants are hereby notified pursuant to Eastern District of California Local 21 Rule 230(a) that the motion is defectively noticed because the hearing date is less than 28 days 22 from the date of filing of the motion. Given the defect, the January 9, 2013, hearing date is 23 vacated. Defendants shall file and serve a new notice of motion setting forth a proper hearing 24 date. Defendants may obtain available hearing dates by contacting the court’s Courtroom 25 Deputy. Failure to file a new notice of motion with a proper hearing date within 20 days of the 26 date of this order will result in termination of the motion as a pending matter on the court’s 1 1 docket. See Local Rule 110. 2 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the January 9, 2013, hearing is vacated. 4 5 6 7 DATED: January 2, 2013 ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?