Anderson et al v. Echols et al
Filing
48
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 1/2/2013 ORDERING that the 1/9/2013 hearing re 47 Motion for Summary Judgment is VACATED. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RON J. ANDERSON, et al.,
12
13
14
15
16
17
No. 2:11-CV-1795-CMK
Plaintiffs,
vs.
ORDER
GREG ECHOLS, et al.,
Defendants.
/
Plaintiffs, who are proceeding pro se, bring this civil action for, among other
18
things, determination of ownership interests in the “Stringer Mine.” On December 20, 2012,
19
defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, noticed for hearing before the undersigned on
20
January 9, 2013. Defendants are hereby notified pursuant to Eastern District of California Local
21
Rule 230(a) that the motion is defectively noticed because the hearing date is less than 28 days
22
from the date of filing of the motion. Given the defect, the January 9, 2013, hearing date is
23
vacated. Defendants shall file and serve a new notice of motion setting forth a proper hearing
24
date. Defendants may obtain available hearing dates by contacting the court’s Courtroom
25
Deputy. Failure to file a new notice of motion with a proper hearing date within 20 days of the
26
date of this order will result in termination of the motion as a pending matter on the court’s
1
1
docket. See Local Rule 110.
2
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the January 9, 2013, hearing is
vacated.
4
5
6
7
DATED: January 2, 2013
______________________________________
CRAIG M. KELLISON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?