Wilkening et al v. Gags & Games, Inc.

Filing 19

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 8/6/2012 ORDERING that Plaintiffs shall have leave to file the proposed First Amended Complaint for Damages and Penalties. Defendant shall file a responsive pleading within 15 days of the filing of said First Amended Complaint. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 LAW OFFICES OF SOHNEN & KELLY HARVEY SOHNEN, SBN 62850 2 PATRICIA M. KELLY, SBN 99837 2 Theatre Square, Suite 230 3 Orinda, CA 94563-3346 Telephone: (925)258-9300 4 Facsimile: (925) 258-9315 5 Attorneys for Plaintiffs JOAN WILKENING, TARA MISSEL, CHRISTOPHER HUGHES, 6 and SABRINA GRAHAM individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated 7 Additional Counsel listed after Signature Line 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 Eastern District of California 10 Sacramento Division 11 12 JOAN WILKENING, TARA MISSEL, CHRISTOPHER HUGHES, and SABRINA 13 GRAHAM individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 14 Plaintiff, 15 v. 16 GAGS AND GAMES, INC. doing business as 17 HALLOWEEN CITY, a Michigan corporation, 18 Defendant. 19 CASE NO.: 2-11-CV-01802-JAM-DAD CLASS ACTION STIPULATION FOR FILING FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER 20 Plaintiffs JOAN WILKENING, TARA MISSEL, and CHRISTOPHER HUGHES, and 21 22 proposed additional Plaintiff SABRINA GRAHAM and Defendant GAGS AND GAMES, INC. 23 doing business as HALLOWEEN CITY, a Michigan corporation, hereby stipulate as follows: 24 WHEREAS Plaintiffs JOAN WILKENING, TARA MISSEL, and CHRISTOPHER 25 HUGHES filed this action individually, and on behalf of those similarly situated on July 8, 2011; 26 27 28 -1STIP. FOR FILING FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com CASE NO.: 2-11-CV-01802-JAM-DAD 1 WHEREAS, the Plaintiffs listed in the initial Complaint, and proposed additional Plaintiff 2 Sabrina Graham seek to file a proposed First Amended Complaint for Damages and Penalties, 3 4 which is Exhibit A hereto; WHEREAS, Defendant agrees to said filing; 5 6 7 8 WHEREAS, Defendant’s entering into this stipulation is not to be deemed a concession that the proposed amendment is meritorious; Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties that Plaintiffs shall 9 have leave to file the proposed First Amended Complaint; and that Defendant shall file a 10 responsive pleading within 15 days after the filing of the First Amended Complaint. 11 Date: August 6, 2012 12 LAW OFFICES OF SOHNEN & KELLY LAW OFFICE OF MARY-ALICE COLEMAN 13 By: 14 15 16 17 Date: August 1, 2012 _____/s/________________________ HARVEY SOHNEN Attorney for Plaintiffs JOAN WILKENING, TARA MISSEL, CHRISTOPHER HUGHES, and SABRINA GRAHAM individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP 18 By: 19 20 ______/s/________________________ TYREEN TORNER Attorneys for Defendant GAGS AND GAMES, INC. 21 Additional Counsel for Plaintiffs: 22 LAW OFFICE OF MARY-ALICE COLEMAN MARY-ALICE COLEMAN, SBN 98365 23 MICHAEL S. AHMAD, SBN 231228 1109 Kennedy Place, Suite #2 24 Davis, CA 95616 Telephone: (916) 498-9131 25 Facsimile: (916) 304-0880 26 27 28 -2STIP. FOR FILING FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com CASE NO.: 2-11-CV-01802-JAM-DAD ORDER 1 2 3 4 Good cause appearing therefor, the foregoing Stipulation is approved. Plaintiffs shall have leave to file the proposed First Amended Complaint for Damages and Penalties, Exhibit A to the foregoing Stipulation. Defendant shall file a responsive pleading within 15 days of the filing of said 5 6 7 8 First Amended Complaint. Dated: 8/6/2012 /s/ John A. Mendez________ __________ THE HONORABLE JOHN A.MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3STIP. FOR FILING FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com CASE NO.: 2-11-CV-01802-JAM-DAD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?