Luciano v. United States of America, et al.,
Filing
58
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/19/13 ORDERING that the United States' deadline for filing a reply to Plaintiff's opposition to 38 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT is EXTENDED to 3/25/13. (Meuleman, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
J. EARLENE GORDON
Assistant United States Attorney
501 I Street, Suite 10-100
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: (916) 554-2700
Facsimile: (916) 554-2900
Attorneys for Defendants UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT
OF AGRICULTURE; TOM VILSACK,
Secretary Of Agriculture; UNITED
STATES FOREST SERVICE; TOM
TIDWELL, RANDY MOORE, ALICE B.
CARLTON, and DEB BUMPUS in their
Official Capacities
10
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
14
ROBERT A. LUCIANO, JR., Trustee
Of The Robert A. Luciano Jr. Revocable
Trust Dated February 27, 1995,
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA;
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
AGRICULTURE; TOM VILSACK,
Secretary Of Agriculture; UNITED
STATES FOREST SERVICE; TOM
TIDWELL, RANDY MOORE, EARL FORD,
DEB BUMPUS,
and DOES 1 - 25,
Defendants.
CASE NO. 2:11-cv-01831-GEB -KJN
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING
DEFENDANT’S DEADLINE TO
FILE REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S
OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
23
24
Plaintiff ROBERT A. LUCIANO, JR. and Defendant the UNITED STATES OF
25
AMERICA, of the above-entitled action, hereby stipulate and agree with the permission of the
26
Court as indicated below to a one-week modification of the Court’s Order filed September 12,
27
Stipulation to Extend Defendant’s Time to File Reply
28
29
30
1
1
2012, re-setting the deadline for filing Defendant’s reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s
2
Motion for Summary Judgment from March 18, 2013 to March 25, 2013.
3
This brief
modification is requested due to the illness of Defendant’s counsel.
4
The parties hereby stipulate and agree that Defendant’s deadline to reply shall be
5
extended to March 25, 2013, which is more than seven days prior to the hearing set for April 8,
6
2013, as required by Local Rule 230(d).
7
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
8
9
Respectfully submitted,
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
DATED: March 18, 2012
10
11
12
/s/ J. Earlene Gordon
J. EARLENE GORDON
Assistant United States Attorney
13
Attorneys for Defendants
14
By:
DATED: March 18, 2013
Richard H. Hart, Jr.
Law Office of Richard H. Hart PC
15
16
By:
17
18
/s/ Richard H. Hart, Jr.
RICHARD H. HART, JR.
Attorney at Law
Attorney for Plaintiff
19
20
[PROPOSED] ORDER
21
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the United States’ deadline for filing a reply to
22
Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is extended to March 25,
23
2013.
24
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
25
26
27
Stipulation to Extend Defendant’s Time to File Reply
28
29
30
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?