Luciano v. United States of America, et al.,

Filing 58

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/19/13 ORDERING that the United States' deadline for filing a reply to Plaintiff's opposition to 38 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT is EXTENDED to 3/25/13. (Meuleman, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
J. EARLENE GORDON
Assistant United States Attorney
501 I Street, Suite 10-100
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT
OF AGRICULTURE; TOM VILSACK,
Secretary Of Agriculture; UNITED
STATES FOREST SERVICE; TOM
TIDWELL, RANDY MOORE, ALICE B.
CARLTON, and DEB BUMPUS in their
Official Capacities

10

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12
13
14

ROBERT A. LUCIANO, JR., Trustee
Of The Robert A. Luciano Jr. Revocable
Trust Dated February 27, 1995,

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA;
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
AGRICULTURE; TOM VILSACK,
Secretary Of Agriculture; UNITED
STATES FOREST SERVICE; TOM
TIDWELL, RANDY MOORE, EARL FORD,
DEB BUMPUS,
and DOES 1 - 25,
Defendants.

CASE NO. 2:11-cv-01831-GEB -KJN
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING
DEFENDANT’S DEADLINE TO
FILE REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S
OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT

23
24

Plaintiff ROBERT A. LUCIANO, JR. and Defendant the UNITED STATES OF

25

AMERICA, of the above-entitled action, hereby stipulate and agree with the permission of the

26

Court as indicated below to a one-week modification of the Court’s Order filed September 12,

27
Stipulation to Extend Defendant’s Time to File Reply

28
29
30

1

1

2012, re-setting the deadline for filing Defendant’s reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s

2

Motion for Summary Judgment from March 18, 2013 to March 25, 2013.

3

This brief

modification is requested due to the illness of Defendant’s counsel.

4

The parties hereby stipulate and agree that Defendant’s deadline to reply shall be

5

extended to March 25, 2013, which is more than seven days prior to the hearing set for April 8,

6

2013, as required by Local Rule 230(d).

7
IT IS SO STIPULATED.

8
9

Respectfully submitted,
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney

DATED: March 18, 2012

10
11
12

/s/ J. Earlene Gordon
J. EARLENE GORDON
Assistant United States Attorney

13

Attorneys for Defendants

14

By:

DATED: March 18, 2013

Richard H. Hart, Jr.
Law Office of Richard H. Hart PC

15
16

By:

17
18

/s/ Richard H. Hart, Jr.
RICHARD H. HART, JR.
Attorney at Law
Attorney for Plaintiff

19
20

[PROPOSED] ORDER

21

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the United States’ deadline for filing a reply to

22

Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is extended to March 25,

23

2013.

24
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

25
26
27
Stipulation to Extend Defendant’s Time to File Reply

28
29
30

2