Garduno v. McDonald

Filing 9

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/24/11 ORDERING that 3 Motion to Proceed IFP is DENIED; Clerk of the Court rename the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed in this case Amended Petition and file it, and petitioners September 14, 2011 motion for a stay, in CIV-S-11-0469 CKD P; and this case is CLOSED.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVEN LAWRENCE GARDUNO, 11 Petitioner, 12 13 No. CIV S-11-1835 CKD P vs. MICHAEL D. MCDONALD, 14 Respondent. 15 ORDER / 16 Petitioner, a California prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for writ of 17 habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He challenges convictions entered in the Superior Court 18 of Sacramento County in 2009. 19 A review of court records in Garduno v. McDonald, CIV-S-11-0469 CKD P 20 reveals that petitioner has a petition for writ of habeas corpus pending in this court in which he 21 also challenges his 2009 Sacramento County convictions. Pursuant to the Ninth Circuit Court of 22 Appeals’ decision in Woods v. Carey, 525 F.3d 886, 890 (9th Cir. 2008), the court will order that 23 the petition filed in this case be identified as an “amended petition” and filed in CIV-S-11-0469 24 CKD P. Petitioner has filed a motion for a stay in this action which will also be transferred to 25 CIV-S-11-0469 CKD P. The court will order that this case be closed. 26 ///// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. Petitioner’s July 14, 2011 motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied; 3 2. The Clerk of the Court rename the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed in 4 this case “Amended Petition” and file it, and petitioner’s September 14, 2011 motion for a stay, 5 in CIV-S-11-0469 CKD P; and 6 7 2. This case is closed. Dated: October 24, 2011 8 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 1 gard1835.trn 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?