Hughes v. CDCR

Filing 81

ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/10/2016 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 76 are ADOPTED in FULL; and Defendant's 52 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution is DENIED. (Reader, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

BERNARD HUGHES,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:11-cv-1856-KJM-EFB P

v.

ORDER

MARTIN H. JANSEN, M.D., et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff, a state prisoner now proceeding through appointed counsel, has filed this civil

18

rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States

19

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On February 24, 2016, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which

20
21

were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the

22

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed

23

objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

24
25

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

26

ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed February 24, 2016, are adopted in full; and

27
28

/////
1

1
2

2. Defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution (ECF No. 52) is denied.
DATED: March 10, 2016

3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2