(PS) Bell III v. University of California Davis Medical Center et al
Filing
46
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 6/7/2013 ADOPTING, in full, #41 Findings and Recommendations; GRANTING #31 Motion to Dismiss; DISMISSING, without leave to amend, Plaintiff's claims as to Title VII, wrongful termination, FMLA as to the Regents; GRANTING Plaintiff leave to amend the remaining claims. (Michel, G)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
WILLIAM BELL III,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
No. 2:11-cv-1864 MCE AC PS
vs.
UNIV. OF CAL. DAVIS MED.
CTR., et al.,
15
Defendants.
ORDER
16
/
17
Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was
18
referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).
19
On May 6, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein
20
which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to
21
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No objections to
22
the findings and recommendations have been filed.
23
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
24
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
25
ORDERED that:
26
1
1
1. The findings and recommendations filed May 6, 2013, are adopted in full
2
(ECF No. 29.);
3
2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss is granted;
4
3. The following claims are dismissed without leave to amend: Title VII,
5
wrongful termination, FMLA as to the Regents; and
6
4. Plaintiff is granted leave to amend the remaining claims.
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8 Date: June 07, 2013
9 _____________________________________
10
11
___________________________________________
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., CHIEF JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?