Casillas et al v. Biggs et al

Filing 29

STIPULATION and ORDER RE CONTINUED ABEYANCE signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/10/14. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
5 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney AUDREY B. HEMESATH Assistant United States Attorney 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (915) 554-2700 Email: Audrey.Hemesath@usdoj.gov 6 Attorneys for Defendants 1 2 3 4 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 AUDREY CASILLAS and FARHAD MASOUDI, Plaintiffs, 11 12 13 v. MICHAEL BIGGS, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ) ) Case No. 2:11-cv-1914 DAD ) ) Joint Status Report, Stipulation re: ) Continued Abeyance and Order ) ) ) ) ) ) 16 This is an immigration case which is currently in abeyance pending resolution of an 17 18 19 administrative appeal by the Board of Immigration Appeals. Unfortunately the Board of Immigration Appeals has not issued a new decision yet, and the matter remains pending at the 20 21 Board. Because a new decision from the Board is an essential next step in this litigation, the 22 parties stipulate to an additional 6-month abeyance period for the conclusion of this 23 administrative process. The parties will file a further status report on May 14, 2015. Good cause 24 having been shown, the parties request a suspension of all other filing deadlines during this 25 period. 26 27 28 1 1 Dated: November 14, 2014 Respectfully submitted, BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney 2 3 /s/ Audrey B. Hemesath AUDREY B. HEMESATH Assistant U.S. Attorney 4 5 6 7 8 DATED: November 14, 2014 9 10 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Sarah Castello Law Office of Robert B. Jobe Attorney for the Plaintiffs 11 12 13 14 ORDER Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 10, 2014 15 16 17 18 19 Ddad1.consent casillas1914.stay10.ord.docx 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?