Casillas et al v. Biggs et al
Filing
29
STIPULATION and ORDER RE CONTINUED ABEYANCE signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/10/14. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
5
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
AUDREY B. HEMESATH
Assistant United States Attorney
501 I Street, Suite 10-100
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: (915) 554-2700
Email: Audrey.Hemesath@usdoj.gov
6
Attorneys for Defendants
1
2
3
4
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
AUDREY CASILLAS and FARHAD
MASOUDI,
Plaintiffs,
11
12
13
v.
MICHAEL BIGGS, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
)
) Case No. 2:11-cv-1914 DAD
)
) Joint Status Report, Stipulation re:
) Continued Abeyance and Order
)
)
)
)
)
)
16
This is an immigration case which is currently in abeyance pending resolution of an
17
18
19
administrative appeal by the Board of Immigration Appeals. Unfortunately the Board of
Immigration Appeals has not issued a new decision yet, and the matter remains pending at the
20
21
Board. Because a new decision from the Board is an essential next step in this litigation, the
22
parties stipulate to an additional 6-month abeyance period for the conclusion of this
23
administrative process. The parties will file a further status report on May 14, 2015. Good cause
24
having been shown, the parties request a suspension of all other filing deadlines during this
25
period.
26
27
28
1
1
Dated: November 14, 2014
Respectfully submitted,
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
2
3
/s/ Audrey B. Hemesath
AUDREY B. HEMESATH
Assistant U.S. Attorney
4
5
6
7
8
DATED: November 14, 2014
9
10
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Sarah Castello
Law Office of Robert B. Jobe
Attorney for the Plaintiffs
11
12
13
14
ORDER
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 10, 2014
15
16
17
18
19
Ddad1.consent
casillas1914.stay10.ord.docx
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?