Smith v. Kiesz et al
Filing
24
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 9/11/12 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 6/20/12 21 are ADOPTED in full; The MOTION to DISMISS 16 is DENIED; and Defendant shall file an answer within thirty days of the filed date of this order. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
DAVID SMITH,
11
Plaintiff,
Defendant.
12
13
No. 2:11-cv-1918 JAM CKD P
ORDER
vs.
KIESZ,
14
15
/
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action
17
seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
18
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
19
On June 20, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations
20
herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any
21
objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Neither
22
party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
23
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
24
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
25
ORDERED that:
26
/////
1
1
1. The findings and recommendations filed June 20, 2012, are adopted in full;
2
2. The motion to dismiss (Docket No. 16) is DENIED; and
3
3. Defendant shall file an answer within thirty days of the filed date of this order.
4
DATED: September 11, 2012
5
/s/ John A. Mendez
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?