Wolinski v. McDonald et al

Filing 68

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/26/13 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations filed November 27, 2012 61 are adopted in full; and Plaintiff's requests and motions, to the extent they are motions for preliminary injunctions or temporary restraining order 45 , 48 , 58 are denied. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KRZYSZTOF F. WOLINSKI, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. CIV S-11-1932-GEB-CMK-P vs. ORDER MIKE D. McDONALD, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 / 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant 18 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 Eastern District of California local rules. 20 On November 27, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations 21 (Doc. 61) herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties 22 may file objections within a specified time. No objections to the findings and recommendations 23 have been filed. 24 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge's analysis. 26 /// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. 3 4 The findings and recommendations filed November 27, 2012 (Doc. 61) are adopted in full; and 2. Plaintiff’s requests and motions, to the extent they are motions for 5 preliminary injunctions or temporary restraining order (Docs. 45, 48, 58) are denied. 6 Dated: March 26, 2013 7 8 9 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. Senior United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?