Keehner v. Jackson Laboratory

Filing 20

STIPULATION and ORDER 19 Re Continuance of 16 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 4/17/2012 resetting MOTION HEARING for 5/21/2012 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Judge William B. Shubb. (Kirksey Smith, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Leo F. Donahue, Esq. - SB#114484 LEO F. DONAHUE, INC. 11344 Coloma Road, Suite 160 Gold River, California 95670 Tel: (916) 859-5999 Fax: (916) 859-5984 donahue@lfdlaw.net Attorney for Plaintiff, KELLY KEEHNER 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KELLY KEEHNER, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 THE JACKSON LABORATORY, a Corporation of unknown origin; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 15 16 17 18 Defendant. _____________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:11-CV-01954-WBS-EFH STIPULATION AND ORDER RE CONTINUANCE OF DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION Date: Time: Ctrm: May 7, 2012 2:00 p.m. Six IT IS STIPULATED between the parties, and the court may 19 order that: 20 1. The Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the 21 Alternative, Summary Adjudication presently set for 22 hearing at 2:00 pm on May 7, 2012 be continued to 2:00 23 pm on May 21, 2012. 24 DATED: April 16, 2012 25 26 27 /s/ Leo F. Donahue LEO F. DONAHUE Attorney for Plaintiff, KELLY KEEHNER 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE CONTINUANCE OF DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE 1 ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 1 DATED: April 16, 2012 2 3 /s/ Amy K. Lee AMY K. LEE Attorney for Defendant, THE JACKSON LABORATORY 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 DATED: April 17, 2012 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE CONTINUANCE OF DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE 2 ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?