Keehner v. Jackson Laboratory
Filing
20
STIPULATION and ORDER 19 Re Continuance of 16 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 4/17/2012 resetting MOTION HEARING for 5/21/2012 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Judge William B. Shubb. (Kirksey Smith, K)
1
2
3
4
5
Leo F. Donahue, Esq. - SB#114484
LEO F. DONAHUE, INC.
11344 Coloma Road, Suite 160
Gold River, California 95670
Tel: (916) 859-5999
Fax: (916) 859-5984
donahue@lfdlaw.net
Attorney for Plaintiff,
KELLY KEEHNER
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KELLY KEEHNER,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
THE JACKSON LABORATORY, a
Corporation of unknown
origin; and DOES 1 through
100, inclusive,
15
16
17
18
Defendant.
_____________________________
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO. 2:11-CV-01954-WBS-EFH
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE
CONTINUANCE OF DEFENDANT’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE,
SUMMARY ADJUDICATION
Date:
Time:
Ctrm:
May 7, 2012
2:00 p.m.
Six
IT IS STIPULATED between the parties, and the court may
19
order that:
20
1.
The Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the
21
Alternative, Summary Adjudication presently set for
22
hearing at 2:00 pm on May 7, 2012 be continued to 2:00
23
pm on May 21, 2012.
24
DATED: April 16, 2012
25
26
27
/s/ Leo F. Donahue
LEO F. DONAHUE
Attorney for Plaintiff,
KELLY KEEHNER
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE CONTINUANCE OF DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE
1
ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION
1
DATED: April 16, 2012
2
3
/s/ Amy K. Lee
AMY K. LEE
Attorney for Defendant,
THE JACKSON LABORATORY
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
DATED: April 17, 2012
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE CONTINUANCE OF DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE
2
ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?