Feezor v. Tata Foods Corp. et al

Filing 18

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 3/16/12: Defendant Tata Foods Corp. dismissed with prejudice. (Kaminski, H)

LYNN HUBBARD III, SBN 69773
SCOTTLYNN J HUBBARD IV, SBN 212970
2 DISABLED ADVOCACY GROUP, APLC
12 Williamsburg Lane
3 Chico, CA 95926
Telephone: [phone]
4 Facsimile: [phone]
1

5

Attorneys for Plaintiff LARY FEEZOR

6

LINDA M. MORONEY, SBN 172668
GORDON & REES LLP
7 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111
8 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
9
10

Attorneys for Defendant TATA FOODS
CORPORATION

11
12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14
15

LARY FEEZOR,

16

Case No. 2:11-cv-01965-LKK-CMK

Plaintiff,

17
18

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
DEFENDANT TATA FOODS CORP. dba
DENNY’S #6886 and
ORDER THEREON

v.
TATA FOODS CORP. dba DENNY’S
#6886; PROSPERITY PROPERTIES
BTM, LLC,

19
20

Defendants.
/

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation for Dismissal of Defendant Tata Foods
Corp. and Order Thereon

-1-

Feezor v. Tata Foods Corp., et al.
Case No. 2:11-cv-01965-LKK-CMK

1

TO THE COURT AND TO ALL PARTIES:

2

Plaintiff, LARY FEEZOR, and defendant, TATA FOODS CORP. dba DENNY’S

3

#6886 (who answered plaintiff’s complaint as Tata Foods Corporation dba Denny’s

4

#6886), stipulate to and jointly request that this Court enter a dismissal with prejudice

5

of plaintiff’s complaint in the above-referenced action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.

6

41(a)(2) as to defendant TATA FOODS CORP. dba DENNY’S #6886 only.

7

Nothing in this request shall be construed to affect plaintiff’s complaint and

8

claims against defendants other than defendant TATA FOODS CORP. dba DENNY’S

9

#6886.

10
11

Dated: March 15, 2012

DISABLED ADVOCACY GROUP, APLC

12

/s/ Lynn Hubbard
LYNN HUBBARD III
Attorney for Plaintiff Lary Feezor

13
14
15

Dated: March 15, 2012

GORDON & REES LLP

16
17
18

/s/ Linda M. Moroney
LINDA M. MORONEY
Attorney for Plaintiff TATA FOODS CORP.
dba DENNY’S #6886

19
20
21

ORDER

22

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the complaint of plaintiff, USDC Case No.

23

2:11-cv-01965-LKK-CMK, is hereby dismissed with prejudice as to defendant TATA

24

FOODS CORP. dba DENNY’S #6886.

25
26

Dated: March 16, 2012.

27
28
Stipulation for Dismissal of Defendant Tata Foods
Corp. and Order Thereon

-2-

Feezor v. Tata Foods Corp., et al.
Case No. 2:11-cv-01965-LKK-CMK