Payne v. Martin et al

Filing 109

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 04/13/16 denying 105 Motion for excusable neglect in which plaintiff seeks the appointment of counsel and "a reasonable amount of time to do research. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LEE’THIEL PAYNE, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:11-cv-1970-TLN-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER J. MARTIN, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. In a motion titled, “motion for excusable neglect,” plaintiff seeks the appointment 19 of counsel and “a reasonable amount of time to do research.” ECF No. 105. 20 This matter is set for trial in July of 2016. ECF No. 92. It is not clear why plaintiff needs 21 more time to research, or what he intends to research. As there are no applicable deadlines to 22 extend, plaintiff’s request for more time is denied as unnecessary. 23 Moreover, district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners 24 in section 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In 25 exceptional circumstances, the court may request an attorney to voluntarily to represent such a 26 plaintiff. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1); Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); 27 Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). When determining whether 28 “exceptional circumstances” exist, the court must consider the likelihood of success on the merits 1 1 as well as the ability of the plaintiff to articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the 2 legal issues involved. Palmer v. Valdez, 560 F.3d 965, 970 (9th Cir. 2009). Having considered 3 those factors, the court finds there are no exceptional circumstances in this case. 4 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s “motion for excusable neglect” 5 (ECF No. 105), in which plaintiff seeks the appointment of counsel and “a reasonable amount of 6 time to do research,” is denied. 7 DATED: April 13, 2016. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?