Payne v. Martin et al

Filing 46

ORDER denying 44 Motion for Reconsideration signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/23/13. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LEE THIEL PAYNE, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 No. 2:11-cv-1970 LKK EFB P J. MARTIN, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 5, 2013, the undersigned dismissed 18 defendant Martin from this action without prejudice. Plaintiff seeks reconsideration of that 19 order. 20 Local Rule 230(j) requires that a motion for reconsideration state “what new or 21 different facts or circumstances are claimed to exist which did not exist or were not shown upon 22 such prior motion, or what other grounds exist for the motion,” and “why the facts or 23 circumstances were not shown at the time of the prior motion.” E.D. Cal., Local Rule 230(j)(3)- 24 (4). 25 26 On October 17, 2012 the assigned magistrate judge provided plaintiff with instructions for effecting service of process on defendant Martin and warned plaintiff that failure 1 to comply with the order or to show good cause for such failure would result in a 2 recommendation that defendant Martin be dismissed, citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). After plaintiff 3 failed to comply with that order, the magistrate judge recommended that defendant Martin be 4 dismissed. Plaintiff failed to file timely objections. Thereafter, the undersigned adopted the 5 magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissed defendant Martin . 6 7 Through his request for reconsideration, plaintiff fails to demonstrate any new or different facts or circumstances that entitle him to reconsideration of the order of dismissal. 8 9 10 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration is DENIED. DATED: April 23, 2013 11 12 13 14 15 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?