LaMark v. Toms Sierra Company, Inc. et al

Filing 8

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 8/29/2011 ORDERING 7 that Defendants are GRANTED an extension until 9/7/2011 to respond or otherwise plead to Plaintiff's complaint.(Reader, L)

1
2
3
4

Jason K. Singleton, Esq., SBN: 166170
SINGLETON LAW GROUP
611 “L” Street, Suite A
Eureka, CA 95501
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
707.441.1533
Email:
[e-mail]

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

Attorneys for Plaintiff
Joshua LaMark
Michael C. Saqui, Esq., SBN: 147853
Erica L. Rosasco, Esq., SBN: 220836
THE SAQUI LAW GROUP Counselors to Management
4120 Douglas Boulevard, Suite 306-402
Granite Bay, California 95746
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Email:
[e-mail] / [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants
Tom’s Sierra Company, Inc. dba Sierra Energy; Sierra Energy and Sierra Super Stop
(Erroneously sued as Toms Sierra Company, Inc., Sierra Energy, LLC dba Sierra Super Stop)

15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17
18

Joshua LaMark,

19
Plaintiff,
20
21

vs.

22

Toms Sierra Company, Inc., a California
corporation; Sierra Energy, LLC, an Arizona
Limited Liability Company dba Sierra Super
Stop, and DOES ONE to FIFTY, inclusive,

23
24
25

Defendants.

26
27
28

Docket No: 2:11-cv-01983-MCE-EFB

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

STIPULATION REGARDING EXTENSION
OF TIME UNTIL SEPTEMBER 7, 2011
FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT; ORDER THEREON

Trial Date: Not Set
Action Filed: 07/27/11

1
LaMark v Tom’s Sierra Company, et al.
USDC Eastern Dist., Docket No. 2:11-cv-01983

Stipulation RE Extension to Respond to Complaint; Order

1

Pursuant to Local Rule 144, Plaintiff Joshua LaMark and Defendants Tom’s Sierra

2

Company, Inc. dba Sierra Energy; Sierra Energy and Sierra Super Stop and through their respective

3

attorneys of record, Joshua K. Singleton and Erica L. Rosasco, stipulate as follows:

4

1.

No extension of time has been previously obtained.

5

2.

These Defendants are granted an extension until September 7, 2011 to respond or

6

otherwise plead to Plaintiff’s complaint.

7

3.

These Defendants’ response will be due no later than September 7, 2011.

8

IT IS SO STIPULATED effective as of August 23, 2011.

9
10
Dated: August 24, 2011

/s/ Joshua K. Singleton (as authorized on 08/24/11)
JOSHUA K. SINGLETON
Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated: August 24, 2011

/s/ Erica L. Roasaco (as authorized on 08/24/11)
ERICA L. ROSASCO
Attorney for Defendants

11
12
13
14
15
16
17

ORDER

18
IT IS SO ORDERED

19
20

Dated: August 29, 2011

21

__________________________________
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

22
23
24

DEAC_Signature-END:

c4d6b0d3

25
26
27
28

2
LaMark v Tom’s Sierra Company, et al.
USDC Eastern Dist., Docket No. 2:11-cv-01983

Stipulation RE Extension to Respond to Complaint; Order