Losel v. Chase Bank USA, N.A. et al

Filing 7

ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/8/2011 re 5 ORDERING that Chase's time to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint hereby is EXTENDED to September 16, 2011.(Duong, D)

1
2
3
4

STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP
JULIA B. STRICKLAND (State Bar No. 083013)
STEPHEN J. NEWMAN (State Bar No. 181570)
2029 Century Park East
Los Angeles, CA 90067-3086
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 310-556-5959
Email: [e-mail]

5
6

Attorneys for Defendant
CHASE BANK USA, N.A.

7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

RONALD L. LOSEL, an individual, on behalf ) Case No. 2:11-cv-01999-KJM-DAD
)
of himself and a class of similarly-situated
) [Assigned to the Hon. Kimberly J. Mueller]
consumers,
)
) STIPULATION AND ORDER
Plaintiff,
) EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO
) COMPLAINT
vs.
)
)
CHASE BANK USA, N.A., a Delaware
)
corporation; DONALD M. PALMER, D.C., an )
)
individual and doing business as California
)
Spine and Disc Pain Center; and DOES 1
)
through 50, inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND
CASE NO. 2:11-cv-01999-KJM-DAD
LA 51446655

1

STIPULATION

2
3
4

WHEREAS, on May 2, 2011, plaintiff Ronald L. Losel (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint (the
“Complaint”) against defendants Chase Bank USA, N.A. (“Chase”) and Donald M. Palmer, D.C.
(“Palmer”)1;

5
6

WHEREAS, the Complaint and Summons were served on and received by Chase after July
1, 2011;

7

WHEREAS, Chase timely filed its Notice of Removal with this Court on July 29, 2011;

8

2029 Century Park East
Los Angeles, California 90067-3086

STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP

9

WHEREAS, Chase must answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by August 10,
2011;

10
11

WHEREAS, counsel for Chase and Plaintiff have agreed to extend the date by which Chase
must answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to September 16, 2011;

12

WHEREAS, counsel for Chase has prior commitments justifying the extension;

13
14
15

WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 144, an initial stipulation extending time to respond to
a complaint may be filed without approval of the Court if the stipulation is signed on behalf of all
parties affected by the stipulation;

16

WHEREAS, no previous extensions have been requested; and

17

WHEREAS, this Stipulation is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay.

18
19
20

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective
counsel of record, that Chase’s time to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint hereby is
extended to September 16, 2011.

21
Dated: August 2, 2011
22

STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP
JULIA B. STRICKLAND
STEPHEN J. NEWMAN

23
24

By:

/s/ Stephen J. Newman
Stephen J. Newman

25
Attorneys for Defendant
CHASE BANK USA, N.A.

26
27
28

1

All of Plaintiff’s individual claims against Palmer have been settled and dismissed.
-1STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND

CASE NO. 2:11-cv-01999-KJM-DAD
LA 51446655

1
Dated: August 2, 2011
2

MAJORS & FOX LLP
FRANK J. FOX

3
By:
4
5

/s/ Frank J. Fox
Frank J. Fox

Attorneys for Plaintiff
Ronald L. Losel

6
7
8

2029 Century Park East
Los Angeles, California 90067-3086

STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP

9
10
11

ORDER
PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

12
13

Dated: August 8, 2011

14

____
Hon. Kimberly J. Mueller
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND
CASE NO. 2:11-cv-01999-KJM-DAD
LA 51446655