Majstoric v. Sacramento County Sheriff's Department et al
Filing
28
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/14/12 DENYING 25 Motion for subpoena. (Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
BRANKO MAJSTORIC,
11
12
Plaintiff,
No. 2:11-cv-2006 KJN P
vs.
13
DEPUTY HOMEN, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
16
ORDER
/
Plaintiff, presently held in the Sacramento County Jail, is proceeding in forma
17
pauperis and without counsel. Plaintiff seeks to subpoena preliminary hearing transcripts from
18
case numbers 09561612 and 1294266. It appears plaintiff seeks to obtain transcripts from
19
hearings held on plaintiff’s charges brought in Sacramento County Superior Court. Plaintiff is
20
advised that preliminary hearing transcripts are prepared by certified court reporters and therefore
21
are not obtained by way of subpoena. If plaintiff was represented by counsel at the preliminary
22
hearing, it is likely that plaintiff’s defense counsel has a copy of the preliminary hearing
23
transcript, and plaintiff may obtain a copy of the transcript from counsel. However, if plaintiff
24
did not have counsel, or counsel does not have a copy of the transcript, plaintiff must contact the
25
court reporter’s office at the Sacramento County Superior Court, 720 Ninth Street, Sacramento,
26
California, and provide the date of the preliminary hearing, the department in which the
1
1
preliminary hearing was held, and the court case number (and plaintiff may have to pay for the
2
transcript) . Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for subpoena (dkt.
3
no. 25) is denied.
4
DATED: June 14, 2012
5
6
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
majs2006.sub
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?