Maxum Indemnity Company v. Court Services, Inc.
Filing
12
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 12/6/11 ORDERING that the Status Conference is CONTINUED from 12/12/11 to 2/27/2012 at 09:00 AM. A further joint Status Report shall be filed no later than fourteen (14) days prior. Further, Plaintiff is notified under Rule 4(m) of the FederalRules of Civil Procedure that failure to serve Defendant Court Services,Inc. with process within the 120 day period prescribed in that Rule may result in the unserved defendant being dismissed.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
MAXUM INDEMNITY COMPANY, a
Delaware corporation,
7
Plaintiff,
8
9
v.
10
COURT SERVICES, INC., a Nevada
corporation; DOES 1 through 10,
11
Defendant.
________________________________
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
2:11-cv-02014-GEB-EFB
ORDER CONTINUING STATUS
(PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)
CONFERENCE; FED. R. CIV. P.
4(M) NOTICE
12
The Status Report filed November 28, 2011, reveals this case
13
14
is
not
ready
to
be
scheduled.
Therefore,
the
Status
(Pretrial
15
Scheduling) Conference scheduled for hearing on December 12, 2011 is
16
continued to February 27, 2012 at 9:00 a.m. A further joint status
17
report shall be filed no later than fourteen (14) days prior.
18
Further, Plaintiff is notified under Rule 4(m) of the Federal
19
Rules of Civil Procedure that failure to serve Defendant Court Services,
20
Inc. with process within the 120 day period prescribed in that Rule may
21
result in the unserved defendant being dismissed. To avoid dismissal, on
22
or before December 16, 2011, Plaintiff shall file proof of service for
23
the defendant or a sufficient explanation why service was not effected
24
within Rule 4(m)’s prescribed service period.
25
Dated:
December 6, 2011
26
27
28
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
United States District Judge
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?