Maxum Indemnity Company v. Court Services, Inc.

Filing 12

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 12/6/11 ORDERING that the Status Conference is CONTINUED from 12/12/11 to 2/27/2012 at 09:00 AM. A further joint Status Report shall be filed no later than fourteen (14) days prior. Further, Plaintiff is notified under Rule 4(m) of the FederalRules of Civil Procedure that failure to serve Defendant Court Services,Inc. with process within the 120 day period prescribed in that Rule may result in the unserved defendant being dismissed.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 MAXUM INDEMNITY COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, 7 Plaintiff, 8 9 v. 10 COURT SERVICES, INC., a Nevada corporation; DOES 1 through 10, 11 Defendant. ________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:11-cv-02014-GEB-EFB ORDER CONTINUING STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE; FED. R. CIV. P. 4(M) NOTICE 12 The Status Report filed November 28, 2011, reveals this case 13 14 is not ready to be scheduled. Therefore, the Status (Pretrial 15 Scheduling) Conference scheduled for hearing on December 12, 2011 is 16 continued to February 27, 2012 at 9:00 a.m. A further joint status 17 report shall be filed no later than fourteen (14) days prior. 18 Further, Plaintiff is notified under Rule 4(m) of the Federal 19 Rules of Civil Procedure that failure to serve Defendant Court Services, 20 Inc. with process within the 120 day period prescribed in that Rule may 21 result in the unserved defendant being dismissed. To avoid dismissal, on 22 or before December 16, 2011, Plaintiff shall file proof of service for 23 the defendant or a sufficient explanation why service was not effected 24 within Rule 4(m)’s prescribed service period. 25 Dated: December 6, 2011 26 27 28 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?