Maxum Indemnity Company v. Court Services, Inc.

Filing 9

ORDER CONTINUING (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 10/24/11 ORDERING that per plaintiff's 8 Request, the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is CONTINUED to 12/12/2011 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.. A further joint status report shall be filed no later than 14 days prior. On or before 11/28/2011 Plaintiff shall file proof of service for any unserved defendant or a sufficient explanation why service was not effected within Rule 4(m)'s prescribed service period. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7

MAXUM INDEMNITY COMPANY, a
Delaware corporation,
Plaintiff,

8
v.

9
10

COURT SERVICES, INC., a Nevada
corporation; DOES 1 through 10,

11

Defendant.
________________________________

12

On

13

October

21,

2011,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

2:11-cv-02014-GEB-EFB
ORDER CONTINUING STATUS
(PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)
CONFERENCE; FED. R. CIV. P.
4(M) NOTICE

Plaintiff

filed

a

“Request

for

14

Continuance of Status Conference.” Therefore, the Status (Pretrial

15

Scheduling) Conference scheduled for hearing on November 14, 2011 is

16

continued to December 12, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. A further joint status

17

report shall be filed no later than fourteen (14) days prior.

18

Further, Plaintiff is notified under Rule 4(m) of the Federal

19

Rules of Civil Procedure that any defendant not served with process

20

within the 120 day period prescribed in that Rule may be dismissed as a

21

defendant. To avoid dismissal, on or before November 28, 2011 Plaintiff

22

shall file proof of service for any unserved defendant or a sufficient

23

explanation why service was not effected within Rule 4(m)’s prescribed

24

service period.

25

Dated:

October 24, 2011

26
27
28

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
United States District Judge

1