Krantz v. Hartley
Filing
4
ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:11-cv-2027 KJN) to Fresno (1:11-cv-1334 DLB) signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/11/2011. (Waggoner, D)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
KENNETH KRANTZ,
11
Petitioner,
12
13
No. 2:11-cv-2027 KJN P
vs.
JAMES D. HARTLEY,
14
Respondent.
15
ORDER
/
16
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of
17
habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma
18
pauperis. In his application, petitioner challenges his denial of parole by Avenal State Prison in
19
Kings County Superior Court. Kings County is part of the Fresno Division of the United States
20
District Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 120(d).
21
Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in
22
the proper division of a court may, on the court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper
23
division of the court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the
24
court. This court will not rule on petitioner’s request to proceed in forma pauperis.
25
////
26
////
1
1
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. This court has not ruled on petitioner’s request to proceed in forma pauperis;
3
2. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern
4
District of California sitting in Fresno; and
5
6
3. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and
shall be filed at:
7
United States District Court
Eastern District of California
2500 Tulare Street
Fresno, CA 93721
8
9
10
DATED: August 11, 2011
11
12
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
13
14
kran2027.109
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?