Berlin Media Art e.k. v Does 1 through 146
Filing
20
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 5/8/12 ORDERING that plaintiff shall have an additional 45 days in which to identify in an amended complaint the present Doe defendants. Service of those defendants shall be made within 30 days o f the expiration of the 45 day period. A further scheduling conference is SET for 8/16/2012 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 9 (GGH) before Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows. Each party shall file an individual scheduling statement in accordance with the previous format ordered by the court. See Order of August 2, 2011. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9 Berlin Media Art e.k.
10
11
Plaintiff,
No. 2:11-cv-2039 KJM GGH
vs.
ORDER
12 DOES 1-146
13
Defendants.
14 ___________________________________/
15
On May 3, 2012, a scheduling conference was held in the above captioned case.
16 No defendants appeared as they have not been identified in the docket of this case. Plaintiff
17 informed the court that it is still in the process of identifying Doe defendants.
18
Plaintiff shall have an additional forty-five (45) days in which to identify in an
19 amended complaint the present Doe defendants. Service of those defendants shall be made
20 within thirty days (30) of the expiration of the 45 day period.
21
After the expiration of the 45 day period in which to file an amended complaint, no
22 further amendments to the complaint adding identified defendants will be approved.
23
A further scheduling conference will be held with all parties before the
24 undersigned on August 16, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. Each party shall file an individual scheduling
25 \\\\\
26 \\\\\
1
1 statement in accordance with the previous format ordered by the court. See Order of August 2,
2 2011.
3 DATED: May 8, 2012
4
/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?