Olson v. Social Security Administration et al
Filing
35
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 5/22/12 DENYING without prejudice 31 Motion to Amend the Complaint. (Meuleman, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KIMBERLY R. OLSON,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. CIV S-11-2059-MCE-CMK
vs.
ORDER
SOCIAL SECURITY
ADMINISTRATION, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
/
17
18
19
Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action. Pending before
the court is plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend (Doc. 31).
20
The court is required to screen complaints filed by litigants who have been
21
granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, as is the case here. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).
22
Because plaintiff has not submitted a proposed amended complaint with the motion for leave to
23
amend, it is impossible for the court to conduct this required task. Plaintiff’s motion is,
24
therefore, denied without prejudice.
25
///
26
///
1
1
Along with plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend, plaintiff states here opposition
2
to defendant’s request to stay discovery. The court notes for plaintiff’s benefit that defendant’s
3
request was addressed at the March 28, 2012, hearing and was granted by order issued on March
4
29, 2012.
5
6
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ordered that plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend
(Doc. 31) is denied without prejudice.
7
8
9
10
11
DATED: May 22, 2012
______________________________________
CRAIG M. KELLISON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?