Olson v. Social Security Administration et al

Filing 35

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 5/22/12 DENYING without prejudice 31 Motion to Amend the Complaint. (Meuleman, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KIMBERLY R. OLSON, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. CIV S-11-2059-MCE-CMK vs. ORDER SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 / 17 18 19 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend (Doc. 31). 20 The court is required to screen complaints filed by litigants who have been 21 granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, as is the case here. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). 22 Because plaintiff has not submitted a proposed amended complaint with the motion for leave to 23 amend, it is impossible for the court to conduct this required task. Plaintiff’s motion is, 24 therefore, denied without prejudice. 25 /// 26 /// 1 1 Along with plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend, plaintiff states here opposition 2 to defendant’s request to stay discovery. The court notes for plaintiff’s benefit that defendant’s 3 request was addressed at the March 28, 2012, hearing and was granted by order issued on March 4 29, 2012. 5 6 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ordered that plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend (Doc. 31) is denied without prejudice. 7 8 9 10 11 DATED: May 22, 2012 ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?