Alston v. City of Sacramento, et al

Filing 27

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 2/2/12 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 11/18/11 14 are ADOPTED and Plaintiff's MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER and for a Preliminary Injunction 10 is DENIED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

C.D. ALSTON,

11
12
13
14
15
16
17

Plaintiff,

No. CIV S-11-2079 JAM EFB PS

vs.
CITY OF SACRAMENTO; SACRAMENTO
CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT; RICK
BRAZIEL; OFFICER PETERSON;
SECURITY GUARD SCOTT; OFFICER
J. MEIGR; OFFICER STEWART;
SUPERVISING SERGEANT ON SITE; and
DOES 1 to 10,
Defendants.
__________________________________/

ORDER

18
19

On November 18, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

20

herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the

21

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.

22
23

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,
concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.

24

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

25

1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed November 18, 2011, are

26

ADOPTED; and
1

1

2. Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order and for a preliminary

2

injunction, Dckt. No. 10, is denied.

3

DATED: February 2, 2012

4
5

/s/ John A. Mendez
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2