Vogan et al v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et al

Filing 25

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 10/24/11 ORDERING that Moving Defendants' request to appear telephonically is granted. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BILLI VOGAN and HAROLD TRAUPEL, individuals, 12 Plaintiffs, 13 vs. 14 WELLS FARGO BANK N.A.; US BANK 15 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR WFMBS 2005-AR12; WELLS FARGO 16 HOME MORTGAGE; and FIRST AMERICAN TRUSTEE SERVICING 17 SOLUTIONS FORMERLY KNOWN AS FIRST AMERICAN LOANSTAR TRUSTEE 18 SERVICES, LLC; and Does 1-100, inclusive, 19 20 Case No. 2:11-CV-02098-JAM-KJN ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. AND U.S. BANK, N.A.’S REQUEST TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY Date: Time: Room: Judge: November 2, 2011 9:30 a.m. 6, 14th Floor The Hon. John A. Mendez Complaint Filed: Trial Date: August 5, 2011 None Defendants. Defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (wrongfully sued as Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and 21 Wells Fargo Home Mortgage) and U.S. Bank, N.A. . (together, “Moving Defendants”) have 22 requested to appear telephonically for the hearing on the motion to dismiss set for 23 November 2, 2011 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 6 before the Honorable John A. Mendez. Having 24 taken this request under consideration, 25 26 27 28 07685/0950/981977.1 -1[PROPOSED] ORDER RE REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE CASE NO. 2:11-CV-02098-JAM-KJN PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com 1 2 3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Moving Defendants’ request to appear telephonically is granted. IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 DATED: 10/24/2011 /s/ John A. Mendez__________ The Honorable John A. Mendez U. S. District Court Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 07685/0950/981977.1 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE REQUEST FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE CASE NO. 2:11-CV-02098-JAM-KJN PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?