Vogan et al v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et al
Filing
81
FINAL JUDGMENT dated *5/8/13* signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 5/7/13. (Kastilahn, A)
1 MARY KATE SULLIVAN (State Bar No. 180203)
M. ELIZABETH HOLT (State Bar No. 263206)
2 meh@severson.com
SEVERSON & WERSON
3 A Professional Corporation
One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600
4 San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 398-3344
5 Facsimile: (415) 956-0439
6 Attorneys for Defendants
WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, a
7 division of WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.;
and US BANK, N.A., as Trustee for WFMBS
8 2005-AR12
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA—SACRAMENTO DIVISION
12
13 BILLI VOGAN and HAROLD TRAUPEL,
14
15
Case No. 2:11-CV-02098-JAM-AC
Plaintiffs,
FINAL JUDGMENT
vs.
16 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; US BANK
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE
17 FOR WFMBS 2005-AR12; WELLS FARGO
HOME MORTGAGE; and FIRST
18 AMERICAN TRUSTEE SERVING
SOLUTIONS FORMERLY KNOWN AS
19 FIRST AMERICAN LOANSTAR TRUSTEE
SERVICES, LLC; and Does 1-100, inclusive,
20
Defendants.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
07685.0950/2678083.1
i
[Proposed] Final Judgment
Case No. 2:11-cv-02098-JAM-AC
1
2
On May ___, 2013, the Court granted Defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”)
3 and US Bank, N.A., as Trustee for WFMBS 2005-AR12 (“U.S. Bank”) motion for summary
4 judgment on all of Plaintiffs Billi Vogan and Harold Traupel’s remaining claims against them.
5
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that judgment be granted in favor of Wells Fargo and U.S.
6 Bank and that plaintiffs take nothing.
7
It is further ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to close the case file and any
8 pending matters related to it.
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
11 DATED: May 7, 2013
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
The Honorable John A. Mendez
United States District Court Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
07685.0950/2678083.1
1
[Proposed] Final Judgment
Case No. 2:11-cv-02098-JAM-AC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?