Vogan et al v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et al

Filing 81

FINAL JUDGMENT dated *5/8/13* signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 5/7/13. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 MARY KATE SULLIVAN (State Bar No. 180203) M. ELIZABETH HOLT (State Bar No. 263206) 2 meh@severson.com SEVERSON & WERSON 3 A Professional Corporation One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600 4 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 398-3344 5 Facsimile: (415) 956-0439 6 Attorneys for Defendants WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, a 7 division of WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; and US BANK, N.A., as Trustee for WFMBS 8 2005-AR12 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA—SACRAMENTO DIVISION 12 13 BILLI VOGAN and HAROLD TRAUPEL, 14 15 Case No. 2:11-CV-02098-JAM-AC Plaintiffs, FINAL JUDGMENT vs. 16 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE 17 FOR WFMBS 2005-AR12; WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE; and FIRST 18 AMERICAN TRUSTEE SERVING SOLUTIONS FORMERLY KNOWN AS 19 FIRST AMERICAN LOANSTAR TRUSTEE SERVICES, LLC; and Does 1-100, inclusive, 20 Defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 07685.0950/2678083.1 i [Proposed] Final Judgment Case No. 2:11-cv-02098-JAM-AC 1 2 On May ___, 2013, the Court granted Defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) 3 and US Bank, N.A., as Trustee for WFMBS 2005-AR12 (“U.S. Bank”) motion for summary 4 judgment on all of Plaintiffs Billi Vogan and Harold Traupel’s remaining claims against them. 5 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that judgment be granted in favor of Wells Fargo and U.S. 6 Bank and that plaintiffs take nothing. 7 It is further ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to close the case file and any 8 pending matters related to it. 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 DATED: May 7, 2013 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ The Honorable John A. Mendez United States District Court Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 07685.0950/2678083.1 1 [Proposed] Final Judgment Case No. 2:11-cv-02098-JAM-AC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?