Brown v. Swan et al
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 12/15/11 granting 10 Motion for Reconsideration. Service is appropriate for defendant California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. The clerk of the court shall send plaintiff 1 USM-285 form, instruction sheet, 1 summons and a copy of the complaint to be completed and returned within 30 days. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
DEXTER BROWN,
11
12
13
Plaintiff,
No. 2:11-cv-2128 JFM (PC)
vs.
CORRECTIONAL SERGEANT
SWAN, D, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
16
/
ORDER
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil
17
rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local
18
Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
19
Plaintiff has moved for reconsideration of this court’s August 23, 2011 order
20
declining to order service of process on the California Department of Corrections and
21
Rehabilitation (CDCR). In that order, the court found that the CDCR was entitled to immunity
22
from suit under the Eleventh Amendment. In his motion for reconsideration, plaintiff contends
23
correctly that the Eleventh Amendment does not apply to claims under the Americans with
24
Disabilities Act (ADA) brought against state agencies. See Duffy v. Riveland, 98 F.3d 447, 452
25
(9th Cir. 1996) (In ADA, Congress expressly abrogated Eleventh Amendment immunity).
26
Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration will be granted.
1
1
The court finds that plaintiff’s complaint states a cognizable claim for relief
2
against the CDCR pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). If the allegations of
3
the complaint are proven, plaintiff has a reasonable opportunity to prevail on the merits of that
4
claim. Plaintiff will be directed to complete and return the forms necessary for service of process
5
on said defendant.
6
In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
7
1. Plaintiff’s November 14, 2011 motion for reconsideration is granted.
8
2. Service is appropriate for the following defendant: California Department of
9
Corrections and Rehabilitation.
10
11
3. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff one USM-285 forms, one summons,
an instruction sheet and a copy of the complaint filed August 11, 2011.
12
13
4. Within thirty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the
attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the following documents to the court:
14
a. The completed Notice of Submission of Documents;
15
b. One completed summons;
16
c. One completed USM-285 form for the defendant listed in number 2
17
above; and
18
d. Two copies of the endorsed complaint filed August 11, 2011.
19
5. Plaintiff need not attempt service on defendant and need not request waiver of
20
service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the United States
21
/////
22
/////
23
/////
24
/////
25
/////
26
/////
2
1
Marshal to serve the above-named defendant pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4
2
without payment of costs.
3
DATED: December 15, 2011.
4
5
6
7
8
12
brow2128.rec
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
DEXTER BROWN,
9
10
11
Plaintiff,
No. 2:11-cv-2128 JFM (PC)
vs.
CORRECTIONAL SERGEANT SWAN, D,
et al.,
NOTICE OF SUBMISSION
Defendants.
____________________________________/
OF DOCUMENTS
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff hereby submits the following documents in compliance with the court's
order filed
:
16
completed summons form
17
completed USM-285 forms
18
copies of the
Complaint
19
DATED:
20
21
Plaintiff
22
23
24
25
26
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?