Johnson v. McCulley et al
Filing
33
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/3/12 ORDERING that a Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is SET for 8/29/2012 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24, (EFB) before Judge Edmund F. Brennan. Plaintiff and defendants McCulley, and Adams need not file a further status report in advance of the status conference. However, if they elect to file a revised status report, any such report shall be filed on or before 8/15/2012. All parties are reminded of their continuing duty to notify chambers immediately of any settlement or other disposition. (Kastilahn, A) Modified on 7/3/2012 (Kastilahn, A).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SCOTT N. JOHNSON,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
No. 2:11-cv-2215-KJM-EFB PS
vs.
KRITAEN MCCULLEY, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
/
15
16
On April 16, 2012, this action was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
17
§ 636(b)(1) and Eastern District of California Local Rule 302(c)(21), and all hearing dates then
18
set before the district judge were vacated. See Dckt. No. 31. Because this case has not yet been
19
scheduled pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b), a status (pretrial scheduling)
20
conference will be set before the undersigned.
21
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
22
1. A status (pretrial scheduling) conference is set for August 29, 2012, at 10:00 a.m. in
23
24
Courtroom No. 24 before the undersigned.
2. In light of the joint status report filed on June 25, 2012 by plaintiff and defendant
25
McCulley, Dckt. No. 29, as well as the separate status report filed by defendant Adams on July
26
2, 2012, Dckt. No. 32, the parties need not file a further status report in advance of the status
1
1
conference. However, if those parties elect to file a revised status report, any such report shall be
2
filed on or before August 15, 2012.
3
3. Failing to obey federal or local rules, or order of this court, may result in dismissal of
4
this action. Even though the court will construe pro se pleadings liberally, pro se litigants must
5
comply with the procedural rules.
6
4. All parties are reminded of their continuing duty to notify chambers immediately of
7
any settlement or other disposition. See L.R. 160. In addition, the parties are cautioned that
8
pursuant to Local Rule 230(c), opposition to granting of a motion must be filed fourteen days
9
preceding the noticed hearing date. The Local Rule further provides that “[n]o party will be
10
entitled to be heard in opposition to a motion at oral arguments if written opposition to the
11
motion has not been timely filed by that party.” Moreover, Local Rule 230(I) provides that
12
failure to appear may be deemed withdrawal of opposition to the motion or may result in
13
sanctions. Finally, Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may be
14
grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the
15
inherent power of the Court.”
16
DATED: July 3, 2012.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?