Ceaser v. Hope Organization, et al

Filing 4

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 9/28/2011 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice; Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; Objections due within 14 days after being served with these F & R's. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OSCAR CEASER, 11 12 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff, vs. CIV S-11-2231 LKK CKD PS HOPE ORGANIZATION, et al., Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS / By order filed August 29, 2011, this court directed plaintiff to submit within 17 twenty days either a completed application and affidavit in support of a request to proceed in 18 forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court, or the appropriate filing fee. That 19 time period has now passed, and plaintiff has not filed a completed application or the filing fee. 20 21 22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States 23 District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within 24 fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file 25 written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate 26 Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections 1 1 within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. 2 Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 3 Dated: September 28, 2011 4 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 7 4 8 ceaser.ftc 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?