Peets v. Sagar Inc et al

Filing 23

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 12/3/12: This action is DISMISSED in its entirety with prejudice.(Kaminski, H)

1

4

LOUIS A. HIGHMAN, State Bar No. 61703
BRUCE J. HIGHMAN, State Bar No. 101760
HIGHMAN, HIGHMAN & BALL
A Professional Law Association
870 Market Street, Suite 467
San Francisco, California 94102
Telephone: [phone]

5

Attorneys for Plaintiff Darlene Peets

2
3

6
7
8
9
In the United States District Court
10
In and for the Eastern District of California
11
Sacramento Division
12
13
14

DARLENE PEETS,

15

No. 2:11-CV-02267-LKK-CKD

Plaintiff,
STIPULATION TO DISMISS ENTIRE
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE;
ORDER

16
17
-v18
19
20
21
22

[F.R.Civ.P. Rule 41[a][1])
SAGAR INC., PAKSN INC.,
Defendants.
___________________________/
Pursuant to the provisions of F.R.Civ.P. Rule 41(a)(1),

23

Plaintiff Darlene Peets and defendants Sagar Inc. and Paksn

24

Inc., by and through their respective attorneys, do hereby

25

Stipulate to dismiss the above-entitled action in its entirety

26

with prejudice.

27

for attorneys’ fees and costs.

None of the parties will seek a court award

28
1
Stip. to Dismiss, Case No. 2:11-CV-02267-LKK-CKD

1

SO STIPULATED:

2

DATED:

November 26, 2012.

LOUIS A. HIGHMAN
BRUCE J. HIGHMAN
HIGHMAN, HIGHMAN & BALL

3
4

By_/s/Louis A. Highman____
Attorneys for Plaintiff
DARLENE PEETS

5
6
7

DATED:

November 26, 2012.

MICHAEL D. BRUNO
STEPHANIE B. WERSEL
GORDON & REES LLP

8
9

By_/s/Stephanie Wersel____
Attorneys for Defendants
Sagar Inc. and Paksn, Inc.

10
11
12
13

ORDER
Good cause appearing therefor, IT IS SO ORDERED.

14
DATED:

December 3, 2012.

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Stip. to Dismiss, Case No. 2:11-CV-02267-LKK-CKD