Franck v. Yolo County, et al.,
Filing
45
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 3/16/2012 ORDERING 41 Motion to Appoint Guardian ad Litem is GRANTED; Herman Franck is hereby APPOINTED as guardian ad litem for Alex Franck and Adam Franck. Hearing on 22 34 Motions is SET for 4/9/2012 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. (Waggoner, D)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
HERMAN FRANCK,
11
NO. CIV. S-11-2284 LKK/GGH
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
14
15
16
17
O R D E R
YOLO COUNTY, PATRICK S.
BLACKLOCK, COUNTY
ADMINISTRATOR; EDWARD G.
PRIETO, YOLO COUNTY SHERIFF,
Defendants.
/
18
Pending before the court are three motions: plaintiff’s
19
Amended Motion to Appoint Herman Franck as Guardian ad Litem for
20
plaintiffs Alex Franck and Adam Franck, ECF No. 41; plaintiff’s
21
motion for a preliminary injunction, ECF No. 22, and defendants’
22
motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint.
23
On January 12, 2012, this court DENIED plaintiff’s original
24
application for appointment of a guardian ad litem, and stayed the
25
other two motions pending appointment of guardian ad litem for the
26
plaintiffs. The court vacated the hearing dates on the other
1
1
motions.
2
application to be appointed guardian ad litem, and he did so. The
3
court is now satisfied with the appointment of Mr. Franck as
4
guardian ad litem for Alex Franck and Adam Franck, who are minors.
5
The
court
granted
Mr.
Franck
leave
to
file
a
new
Accordingly, the court ORDERS as follows:
6
[1] Plaintiff’s application, ECF No. 41 is GRANTED.
7
Herman Franck is hereby appointed as guardian ad litem
8
for Alex Franck and Adam Franck.
9
[2] A hearing on the two pending motions, ECF Nos. 22
10
and 34 is SET for April 9, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. The court
11
considers briefing to be complete on both motions.
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
DATED:
March 16, 2012.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?