Carr v. Cate

Filing 18

[PLEASE DISREGARD (see doc. # 19) JUDGMENT dated *1/12/11* pursuant to order signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 1/11/12. (Kaminski, H) Modified on 1/12/2012 (Kaminski, H).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANDRE T. CARR, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:11-cv-2288 MCE DAD (PC) vs. MATTHEW CATE, 15 Defendant. 16 ORDER / 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil action on a form 18 civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On December 12, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 21 herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections 22 to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 1 1 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 2 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire 3 file including the objections, the Court finds the December 12, 2011, findings and 4 recommendations supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, 5 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 6 7 8 9 10 1. The findings and recommendations filed December 12, 2011 (ECF No. 12), are ADOPTED in full; 2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice, see Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. at 486-87; and 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 11 12 13 14 Dated: January 11, 2012 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?