Quair v. Gertz
Filing
39
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/24/2012 ORDERING that plaintiff's 38 motion for issuance of subpoenas is DENIED; and all requests for discovery pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 31, 33, 34 or 36 shall not be served later than 14 days after service of this order. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAMMY R. QUAIR, SR.,
11
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
No. CIV S-11-2293 CKD P
GERTZ, Sheriff,
14
Defendant.
15
ORDER
/
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis pursuant to 42
17
U.S.C. § 1983. On April 3, 2012, plaintiff filed a motion seeking subpoena forms so that he
18
could obtain statements from defendants, medical records, and other documents. (Dkt. No. 38.)
19
Per the scheduling order, the parties may conduct discovery until June 15, 2012, and all requests
20
for discovery pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 31, 33, 34 or 36 shall not be served later than sixty days
21
prior to that date. (Dkt. No. 32.) Plaintiff is advised that these Rules set forth the procedures for
22
obtaining documents and statements from defendants; subpoenas are not appropriate at this stage
23
of the proceedings. Therefore plaintiff’s motion will be denied. However, in light of plaintiff’s
24
need for clarification of the discovery process, the deadline for discovery requests shall be
25
extended for 14 days after service of this order.
26
\\\\\
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. Plaintiff’s April 3, 2012 motion for issuance of subpoenas (Dkt. No. 38) is
3
denied; and
4
5
2. All requests for discovery pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 31, 33, 34 or 36 shall not
be served later than 14 days after service of this order.
6
Dated: April 24, 2012
7
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
2
11
quai2293.ord2
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?