Quair v. Gertz
Filing
54
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 03/01/13 vacating 52 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and denying 53 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAMMY R. QUAIR, JR.,
11
12
13
14
15
16
Plaintiff,
No. 2:11-cv-2293 JAM CKD P
Defendant.
ORDER
vs.
GERTZ,
/
On February 1, 2013, the court issued findings and a recommendation that this
17
action be dismissed pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure due to
18
plaintiff’s failure to comply with an order directing him to file an opposition or statement of non-
19
opposition to defendant’s September 12, 2012 motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff was
20
granted fourteen days to file objections to the findings and recommendations. (Dkt. No. 52.)
21
Plaintiff did not timely file objections. However, on February 25, 2013, plaintiff
22
filed objections stating that he had been recently hospitalized. In opposition to summary
23
judgment, he submitted five inmate request forms from July 2010 that are relevant to this action;
24
indeed, defendant filed these forms along with his motion for summary judgment. (See Dkt.
25
Nos. 44-4, 44-9, 44-10, 44-11, 44-12.) Plaintiff asserts that “with these new request slips, there’s
26
no possible way at all that I will not win my case at trial.” (Dkt. No. 52 at 2.) The court
1
1
construes plaintiff’s February 25, 2013 filing as his opposition to summary judgment and will
2
vacate its February 1, 2013 recommendation of dismissal.
3
Plaintiff has also requested the appointment of counsel. The United States
4
Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent
5
indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298
6
(1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of
7
counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir.
8
1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the
9
court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff’s request for the
10
appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.
11
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
12
1. The findings and recommendations filed February 1, 2013 (Dkt. No. 52) are
13
hereby vacated; and
14
15
16
2. Plaintiff’s February 25, 2013 motion to appoint counsel (Dkt. No. 53) is
denied.
Dated: March 1, 2013
17
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
18
19
20
21
2
quai2293.vac
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?