Quair v. Gertz

Filing 90

AMENDED ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/26/2015 ORDERING that by 4 p.m. on 5/27/2015, defendants' counsel shall contact Judge Newman's chambers to SHOW GOOD CAUSE why the settlement conference should not go forward as planned. Failure to comply with this order may result in sanctions. (cc: KJN, ADR) (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SAMMY R. QUAIR, SR., 12 13 14 15 Nos. 2:11-cv-2293 JAM CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER GERTZ, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 On February 6, 2015, this court ordered the parties to inform the court’s ADR division in 19 writing whether they believed a settlement conference in consolidated cases 2:11-cv-2293 and 20 2:11-cv-2294 would be beneficial. (ECF No. 80.) On March 9, 2015, defendants’ counsel 21 informed the ADR division in writing that defendants were agreeable to a settlement conference. 22 On March 13, 2015, a settlement conference was set before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman 23 for June 2, 2015. (ECF No. 84.) A writ was issued to transport plaintiff to court to attend the 24 conference. (ECF No. 85.) Due to the logistics of transporting prisoners, prison officials may 25 begin transporting plaintiff any day now. 26 27 On May 21, 2015, a member of defense counsel’s staff contacted the ADR division to request that the settlement conference be canceled. 28 1 1 By 4 p.m. on May 27, 2015, defendants’ counsel shall contact Judge Newman’s chambers, 2 916-930-4710, to show good cause why the settlement conference should not go forward as 3 planned. Failure to comply with this order may result in sanctions. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 26, 2015 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 2 / quai2293.osc 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?