Benyamini v. Hommer et al

Filing 67

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/24/14 ORDERING that Plaintiffs additional request for reassignment of the Magistrate Judge, construed as a motion to recuse 64 is DENIED, as plaintiff has made no showing of the claimed conflict.(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ROBERT BENYAMINI,

12

No. 2:11-cv-2317 TLN AC P

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

O’BRIAN, et al.,

15

ORDER

Defendants.

16
Good cause having been shown, defendants’ request for a further 21-day extension of time

17
18

to serve responses to Plaintiff’s Request for Admissions, Set One, Request for Production of

19

Documents, Set One, and Interrogatories, Set One (ECF No. 66), is GRANTED. Defendants’

20

responses to these discovery requests are now due on or before December 10, 2014.
Good cause having been shown, plaintiff’s motion for a 30-day extension of time to

21
22

answer discovery (ECF No. 65) is also GRANTED.
Plaintiff’s request for appointment of an attorney (ECF No. 65) is DENIED, as plaintiff

23
24

has thus far made no showing of the good cause or extraordinary circumstances needed to justify

25

such an appointment. See Palmer v. Valdez, 560 F.3d 965, 970 (9th Cir. 2009), cert. denied, 559

26

U.S. 906 (2010).

27

////

28

////
1

1

Plaintiff’s additional request for reassignment of the Magistrate Judge, construed as a

2

motion to recuse (ECF No. 64) is DENIED, as plaintiff has made no showing of the claimed

3

conflict.

4

DATED: November 24, 2014

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2