Ivey v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al

Filing 17

ORDER of RELATED CASES and CONSOLIDATION signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 1/11/12 ORDERING cases 2:11-CV-02325-GEB-CKD, 2:11-CV-02461-GEB-CKD, 2:11-CV-02458-GEB-CMK, 2:11-CV-02322-JAM-EFB, 2:11-CV-02382-JAM-CKD, 2:11-CV-02654-JAM-GGH, 2:11- CV-02769-JAM-EFB, 2:11-CV-03163-JAM-CKD, 2:11-CV-02311-KJM-CMK, 2:11-CV-02380-KJM-EFB, 2:11-CV-02414-KJM-DAD, 1:11-CV-01452-LJO-GSA, 1:11-CV-01465-LJO-GSA, 1:11-CV-01471-LJO-GSA, 1:11-CV-01470-LJO-GSA, 1:11-CV-01481-LJO-GSA, 1:11-CV-01479-LJO-GSA, 1: 11-CV-01529-LJO-GSA, 1:11-CV-01575-LJO-GSA, 1:11-CV-01576-LJO-GSA, 1:11-CV-01631-LJO-GSA, 1:11-cv-01862-LJO-GSA, 2:11-CV-02310-MCE-GGH, 2:11-CV-02323-MCE-CKD, 2:11-CV-02326-MCE-DAD, 2:11-CV-02361-MCE-CKD, 2:11-CV-02416-MCE-GGH, 2:11-CV-02460-MCE-DAD, 2:11-cv-03031-MCE-DAD, 2:11-CV-02381-WBS-CKD and 2:11-CV-02411-WBS-GGH are RELATED and REASSIGNED to District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows. It is further ORDERED that these actions are CONSOLIDATED. 2:11-cv- 2310 MCE GGH is designated as the master file. The clerk is directed to add all complaints and answers filed in member cases to the master case. The clerk is directed to close all member cases. Parties are DIRECTED to file all future pleadings, motions and other filings ONLY in 2:11-cv-2310 MCE GGH. All dates currently set in the member actions are VACATED. CASE CLOSED.(Donati, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRANDON MARSHALL, et.al., 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:11-cv-02310-MCE-GGH (and Consolidated Cases) ORDER OF RELATED CASES AND CONSOLIDATION v. AT&T MOBILITY LLC, a Limited Liability Company, 15 16 Defendant. _________________________________/ 17 18 After review of the parties Stipulation Coordinating Cases 19 for Pretrial Purposes received on December 29, 2011, the Court 20 makes the following Orders: 21 Examination of the below listed civil actions reveals that 22 these actions are related within the meaning of Local Rule 123(a) 23 (E.D. Cal. 1997). 24 defendants and are based on the same or similar claims, the same 25 property transaction or event, similar questions of fact and the 26 same questions of law, and would therefore entail a substantial 27 duplication of labor if heard by different judges. 28 /// The actions involve many of the same 1 1 Accordingly, the assignment of the matters to the same judge is 2 likely to effect a substantial savings of judicial effort and is 3 also likely to be convenient for the parties. 4 practice of this Court, related cases are generally assigned to 5 the district judge and magistrate judge to whom the first filed 6 action was assigned. 7 Under the regular IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 42 8 the below listed actions are reassigned to Judge Morrison C. 9 England, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows and 10 consolidated for all further proceedings. 11 Any dates currently set in said actions are hereby VACATED. 12 13 Plaintiff Name Case No. Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Tara Farrell Gretchen Mazzera Hubert Godinez Stuart Ivey Annalissa Casaucau Rick Earp et al. Shahriar Alami et al. Justin Goldner Tamara Adams (Ayers) Caoinlean Arring Anthony Poulos Sharon Jones Juanita Valadez Lizette CruzJones Joseph Kyle Demers Cesar Arvizu Ebony Villasenor Jackie Cosgrove 2:11-CV-02325-GEB-CKD Garland 2:11-CV-02461-GEB-CKD Garland 2:11-CV-02458-GEB-CMK Garland 2:11-CV-02322-JAM-EFB John A. 2:11-CV-02382-JAM-CKD John A. E. Burrell E. Burrell E. Burrell Mendez Mendez 2:11-CV-02654-JAM-GGH John A. Mendez 2:11-CV-02769-JAM-EFB John A. Mendez 2:11-CV-03163-JAM-CKD John A. Mendez 2:11-CV-02311-KJM-CMK Kimberly J. Mueller 2:11-CV-02380-KJM-EFB Kimberly 2:11-CV-02414-KJM-DAD Kimberly 1:11-CV-01452-LJO-GSA Lawrence 1:11-CV-01465-LJO-GSA Lawrence 1:11-CV-01471-LJO-GSA Lawrence J. J. J. J. J. Mueller Mueller O’Neill O’Neill O’Neill 1:11-CV-01470-LJO-GSA Lawrence J. O’Neill 1:11-CV-01481-LJO-GSA Lawrence J. O’Neill 1:11-CV-01479-LJO-GSA Lawrence J. O’Neill 1:11-CV-01529-LJO-GSA Lawrence J. O’Neill 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Richard Browne Armando Rodriguez Edith Magana et al. Marc Castillo et al. Brandon Marshall Jonathan Harms Todd Bettencourt Brandon Vickner et al. Tsz Fung Ho Elizabeth Merrick Carlos Garcia et al. Salvatore Scire Fernando Zamudio 1:11-CV-01575-LJO-GSA Lawrence J. O’Neill 1:11-CV-01576-LJO-GSA Lawrence J. O’Neill 1:11-CV-01631-LJO-GSA Lawrence J. O’Neill 1:11-cv-01862-LJO - Lawrence GSA 2:11-CV-02310-MCE-GGH Morrison 2:11-CV-02323-MCE-CKD Morrison 2:11-CV-02326-MCE-DAD Morrison 2:11-CV-02361-MCE-CKD Morrison J. O’Neill C. C. C. C. England, England, England, England, Jr. Jr. Jr. Jr. 2:11-CV-02416-MCE-GGH Morrison C. England, Jr. 2:11-CV-02460-MCE-DAD Morrison C. England, Jr. 2:11-cv-03031-MCE-DAD Morrison C. England, Jr. 2:11-CV-02381-WBS-CKD William B. Shubb 2:11-CV-02411-WBS-GGH William B. Shubb 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 1. 15 actions are consolidated; 2. 16 17 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 42, the above listed Case No. 2:11-cv-02310-MCE-GGH is designated as the “master file”; 3. 18 The Clerk of the Court is directed to add all 19 complaints and answers filed in the member cases to the master 20 case; 4. 21 22 The Clerk of the Court is to issue an Order Requiring Joint Status Report due on or before July 11, 2012; 5. 23 The Clerk of the Court is directed to administratively 24 close all member cases; and that the Clerk of the Court make 25 appropriate adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to 26 compensate for this reassignment; and 27 /// 28 /// 3 1 2 3 6. The parties are directed to file all future pleadings, motions and other filings ONLY in case No. 2:11-cv-02310-MCE-GGH. Dated: January 11, 2012 4 5 6 _____________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?