Turner v. Colon

Filing 77

ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/8/2013 ADOPTING 67 Findings and Recommendations; DENYING 40 Motion to Revoke IFP Status. (Michel, G)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LEO B. TURNER, Jr., Plaintiff, 11 12 vs. 13 No. 2:11-cv-2343 KJM AC P R. COLON, et al., Defendants. 14 ORDER / 15 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 16 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 17, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, 19 20 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 21 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Neither party has 22 filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United 23 24 States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 25 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 26 ///// 1 1 1983). Having carefully reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to 2 be supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The findings and recommendations filed May 17, 2013 (ECF No. 67), are 5 6 adopted in full; and 2. Defendants’ motion to revoke plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status (ECF No. 7 40), pursuant to the three-strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), is denied. 8 DATED: August 8, 2013. 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?