Stewart v. Allison et al

Filing 25

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/27/12 ORDERING that Petitioners motion for an extension of time 23 is GRANTED; Petitioner shall file a traverse in this matter on or before April 22, 2012; Petitioners motion to substitute Warden Diaz in place of former Warden Allison 24 is GRANTED; and the Clerk of the Court is directed to amend the docket to reflect that Warden Ralph M. Diaz is the respondent in this action. (Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TOUSAUN STEWART, 11 Petitioner, 12 No. CIV S-11-2348 JAM DAD P vs. 13 RALPH M. DIAZ, Warden, 14 Respondent. 15 ORDER / 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding through counsel, has requested a fourth 17 extension of time to file a traverse. Good cause appearing, the court will grant petitioner’s 18 request. 19 Petitioner has also requested that the court substitute Ralph M. Diaz, Warden, 20 California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility and State Prison, Corcoran, California, in place of 21 Kathleen Allison, former Warden, California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility and State 22 Prison, Corcoran, California. Good cause appearing, the court will grant petitioner’s request and 23 direct the Clerk of the Court to amend the docket to reflect that Warden Ralph M. Diaz is now 24 the respondent in this action. 25 ///// 26 ///// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. Petitioner’s motion for an extension of time (Doc. No. 23) is granted; 3 2. Petitioner shall file a traverse in this matter on or before April 22, 2012; 4 3. Petitioner’s motion to substitute Warden Diaz in place of former Warden 5 Allison (Doc. No. 24) is granted; and 6 4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to amend the docket to reflect that Warden 7 Ralph M. Diaz is the respondent in this action. 8 DATED: March 27, 2012. 9 10 11 DAD:9 stew2348.111t(4) 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?